this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
131 points (100.0% liked)

news

24016 readers
1053 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] makotech222@hexbear.net 68 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I don't know much about modern air forces, but 6 jets in a single mission seems catastrophically bad.

[–] edge@hexbear.net 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

6 jets lost, in their opening move. They had the luxury of attacking at whatever time they wanted without Pakistan knowing, but they still lost 6 jets.

[–] IttihadChe@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 day ago

Tbf Pakistan knew the attack was imminent for several days.

Also not necessarily a good sign.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 18 points 1 day ago

Maybe the whole squadron was 5 Rafale jets & someone crashed in a parked one in a hangar back at the base.

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It is really bad for the mission they were carrying out, launching air launched cruise and ballistic missiles from well within Indian airspace, hundreds of km away from the targets. One Rafale got shot down 140km inside Indian territory. High losses are expected, but they didn't even get a single Pakistani jet.

I wrote more here yesterday

[–] tocopherol@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I appreciate all your excellent posts on this! If you don't mind a further question, what is the situation like for a Rafale pilot when they are targeted by these missiles? As in, how much time do they have to react, what sort of countermeasure if any did they have available?

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

PL-15 is a very long range radar guided missile, so time till impact varies on launch distance, and when or if it's detected. The PL-15 has a maximum burnout velocity of over 6500kph, around Mach 5.5. However average velocity will be substantially lower than that due to aerodynamic drag after the daul pulse rocket motor has finished burning out, and at very long range air to air missiles like the AIM-120D, air launched SM-6, R-37M and the PL-15 use a quasi ballistic trajectory to maximise range. If you assume an average velocity of 3000kph and a firing distance of 150km (max range of the export variant of the PL-15, called the PL-15E is 145km, domestic variant up to 300km in extreme scenarios), and an instant launch detection, at most a pilot would have 180 seconds, or three minutes, to carry out evasive maneuvers and deploy countermeasures. However, that's a best case scenario. Realistically a pilot will have less time, the average speed of the missile could be faster, or detection much later.

To detect a radar guided missile, modern jets have something called a radar warning receiver (RWR) to detect enemy radars, changes of frequency when being locked onto and fired upon, etc. The Rafale has a big one on the vertical stabiliser.

However, modern radar guided missiles are not only guided by the radar on the launch aircraft (semi active homing), they have their own mini radars on the missile themselves, that can lock onto a target once close enough, and can operate fully autonomously at that point (fire and forget capability). These are called active radar homing missiles, or fox threes by NATO pilots. The PL-15 is one such missile, it has a mini active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar in the nosecone.

This complicates jamming and detection efforts, as the enemy fighter can turn off their radar after a certain point, or with modern datalink capabilities, the missile can be guided by a completely different source such as an AWACS aircraft, until it gets to the point it can use its own radar. Then the RWR struggles to detect the initial launch, as the fighter launching it can have it's radar completely off, or turn it off soon after launch. Then the RWR would only detect the missile much later, when it turns on it's own radar. The RWR could even be jammed by the enemy, making it inoperable, leaving only the missile approach warning system to detect an incoming missile, these are usually passive systems that make use of infrared search and track technology, so if relatively short range, they were initially invented to detect incoming infrared guided missiles. As for jamming the radar of the missile itself, modern active homing missiles with mini AESA radars can even do frequency hopping, to hop onto a clean frequency, or even home in on a jamming source itself. Complex "kill chains". This all complicates things greatly, which is why many say modern air combat is a case of see first, shoot first, win. And Pakistan has the advantage in the amount of "eyes" they have (more AWACS aircraft and more fighters with AESA radars). Of course a friendly AWACS could inform a fighter pilot of an incoming projectile once they detect it using their much more powerful radars, but they have to detect it.

For countermeasures, options available are electromagnetic jamming (already discussed that), and chaff dispensing, or even towed decoys attached to the aircraft itself, while taking evasive maneuvers to try force an energy defeat scenario (the missile runs out energy). No flares as it's a radar guided missile. However, with modern active homing missiles with mini AESA radars, chaff and decoys no longer work as well, as the radar, despite being much smaller, is much closer to the target itself, making it easier for it to differentiate between the target and chaff or decoys. As for energy defeat, it's quite possible, especially if the missile is not very agile to begin with, like an R-37M for instance. But that requires the pilot to be informed of the launch as it happens, to have enough time to maneuver and bleed the incoming missile of its energy. And a PL-15 is more agile than an R-37M. A direct hit is not needed, modern blast fragmentation missiles have a proximity fuse that will set off the warhead once close enough, coating the target in shrapnel.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CommCat@hexbear.net 38 points 1 day ago

If the number is correct or even close to that number, it's a disaster for IAF, a major embarrassment.

[–] Chapo_is_Red@hexbear.net 15 points 1 day ago

Iirc, India is claiming only three "crashed", but still

[–] IttihadChe@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hopefully this results in India realizing the best course of action is to declare a false victory and move on without leading to a larger war.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 31 points 1 day ago (9 children)

If a singular nuke goes off over there and you see it on the news i want everyone who sees this to know what they need to do. As soon as you find out drop everything you are doing and go to the grocery store. Spend every penny you have and buy as much shelf stable food as possible.

Rice, flax seed, corn, beans, tomatoes, carrots, and peppers are nutritionally balanced when combined (have all the vitamins you need) and can be found either canned or dried. If you cant afford all of them prioritize enriched rice and peppers. Youll have calories and wont get scurvy.

Once youve spent all your money on food get home, and secure your house. If you have weapons get them ready, and ideally have a radio to listen for alerts. Barricade doors and windows. Fill your bathtub and sink and anything else you have up with drinking water.

Go online and download PDFs on edible wild plants in your area. Herbalism, etc. Print them off if you can. But even it not keep them saved you can always recharge devices later if you find solar panels.

The top killer in a situation like this will be famine. Which will cause panic. You need food and a secure place to hunker down. Radiation likely wont be an issue for anyone not near the area but worldwide famine is likely. Smoke from the fires will blot out the sun and kill crops. The reason you barricade the home is to keep desperate people from breaking in.

If you lose power btw you CAN cook rice without power. Leave it in water for 8-12 hours. It will be gritty but edible.

The goal here is to survive about a month or 2. Once famines hit most people wont last more than a few weeks. If you can survive the initial wave itll be a lot easier to survive going forward from that. At that point get in touch with other survivors and start growing food.

[–] Gosplan14_the_Third@hexbear.net 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You're assuming that the situation would be orderly enough for buying to still be possible - for the internet to still be accessible and online, the power grid itself to be still working, drinking water not to be contaminated and even emergency radio to be active. Most of all - the need to arm oneself, with the implicit expectation to win any confrontation.

You and I are both guilty of relying on media portrayals of a societal collapse - the likelihood everything would go according to expectations is probably nil.

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think this "barricade your doors, every man for himself" thing is how you'd survive. You need the community.

[–] Chapo_is_Red@hexbear.net 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup. Even thinking cynically, those organized in groups will be able to deprive the individualists of their stockpiles.

[–] Eiren@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 day ago

Working together is always the winning strategy.

[–] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Did you even read my post? I didnt make any of those assumptions thats why i stressed to drop everything and do this immediately. Everything i listed should be done within an hour or 2 of the first bomb going off. If your not in the region it went off in society isnt just gonna collapse instantly. There will be a very short window to react. i literally address many of the things you bring up in my comment. Like cooking rice in cold water, filling bathtubs and containers before taps run dry, etc.

How does me saying to have a weapon imply youll win every fight?? Its just a measure to take to improve your chances. Your certainly gonna do better with one than without.

As for emergency radio you check it regardless of if itll be working or not. You dont just assume it wont be and not bother. Thats the whole point of the post. It doesnt garuntee anything survival or otherwise it just improves your chances to take measures like this.

If you have some sort of issue with the advice im giving and want to add on to it, or correct something and offer a better alternative please do so, but why barely skim my comment and reply basically saying "nuh uh" in more words?

[–] Gosplan14_the_Third@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You ain't surviving shit in such a situation. I'm not either - that's guaranteed though.

In the case it actually does happen and you succeed - enjoy your survivalist fantasy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xj9@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hurry up and get ready to react at the last minute owl-wink

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago

Good thinking & nicely structured, but I live in a city so I'm getting flashbanged on day 1 before the first nuke memes reach me (that is how I get my news).

[–] xj9@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Waiting until the bombs drop is silly. You should be organizing already and making sure that food-insecure people have access to the food that they need to survive. You need allies to survive. That's what organizing is about. We are all already in a war of attrition with capital. People get displaced to make room for luxury developments all the time. People go hungry all the time. If you aren't already cooperating with your friends and neighbors to correct this situation, you should start doing that today. Last minute panic buying random supplies isn't going to cut it. It feels silly to quote a sci-fi story here, but "the more you share, the more your bowl will be plentiful" rings true to me.

Pretending you're the protagonist of a fallout game isn't going to keep you alive. I love wilderness survival and high adventure stuff, but I know it takes a village to survive long term. Learning to use a gun isn't a bad idea either, assuming you have access to a shooting range that isn't racist/fascist/xenophobic. Unless you have training tho, don't bother with those expensive pieces. You're better off spending it on something more practical for your specific situation.

[–] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This was advice geared towards people who haven't prepared. If someone is already prepared then they wouldn't need advice on what to do. Idk why your acting as if im somehow against organizing because i gave people a quick rundown on how to maybe survive if an unexpected global famine happens and they arent prepared for it.

A lot of people who are currently just working 60 hours a week going home passing out and repeating aren't gonna be prepared for when this happens, but if they take a few simple steps like i described their chances of starving to death decrease a lot. Spreading this information to them is not somehow anti-community organizing, and i literally mention how they should seek out community once its safe to do so.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

Can I recommend also, should you ever find yourself in this situation to think of others too. If you are selfless enough to care about your neighbour's life more than your own; even about the lives of people you haven't met; or more easily, how about the children near you; what a wonderful thing! If you can care enough to share what you get your hands on, and be as little prejudiced as possible to others looking for food (e.g. in that first panicked rush), though you're scared of running out yourself, that's so good!

But not just for the love you have for your fellow (wo)man. For society: if most people act generously and kindly, and with restraint, then everyone benefits, including yourself.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I have a whole freezer full of dried out workout powder stuff already. Probably enough to last a whole year for me and my bf. I also have a ton of potato seed tuber things and I'm very good at making bucket potatoes 💅

But yeah idgaf about prepping for this shit if every country gets in on it then its a coin flip if you live or not unless you live in a bunker 24/7. There's also a very likely chance that society will devolve and re-evolve very quickly by gigantic paramilitary groups forming and duking it out. Anything any one prepper can do in that situation is limited.

The real prepping is getting a bunch of commie friends good at shooting guns

[–] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I think everyones misunderstanding my post. This is specifically in relation to a LIMITED regional exchange between India and Pakistan. If theres a global exchange of nukes its entirely different. People dont seem to realize even JUST India and Pakistan doing this and nobody else launching would cause a worldwide famine within weeks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Saeculum@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is good advice, but I live near several major military installations and a major urban centre. My plan for this scenario is to bend over, place my head firmly between my legs and kiss my ass goodbye.

[–] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Just because one nuke goes off doesnt mean they all fly. If india and pakistan nuke eachother i doubt other nations would immediately join in. Its not like it would be totally unexpected so like if China picks up ICBMs on their radar over India for example i doubt they immediately launch in response.

So dont just assume your gonna get nuked too unless your in the region. The issue is that even if its just them nuking eachother itll disrupt the climate and cause mass famine globally.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 day ago

Excellent write up, food and water are really the critical thing to focus on in the immediate aftermath.

[–] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

suicide

If you can survive the initial wave itll be a lot easier to survive going forward from that. At that point get in touch with other survivors and start growing food.

You all can have fun with that, best of luck, but if shit gets that bad I'm killing myself.

[–] Alisu@hexbear.net 1 points 23 hours ago

cw mental health, self-harmI'm thinking about it while everything is still "fine"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

knowing my luck, I'll end up sleeping through the nuclear apocalypse.

But on that first point, it's a good idea to spend a little extra each time you go shopping (just $5-10 if you can afford it) to grab some emergency canned food. It's how I managed to save up a stockpile. Much better than rushing out and panic buying at the same time as everyone else. It'll be a bloodbath.

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Four confirmed at the moment. Two Rafales, and two Sukhoi Su-30MKIs or Mikoyan MiG-29s

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is that acknowledged by India yet?

[–] Meltyheartlove@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago

I think they admitted the Rafales which france did as well.

[–] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Turns out that, in the end, Pakistan was the real lion all along

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago

~~Ghost of Kiev~~ Ghost of Islamabad.

[–] CommCat@hexbear.net 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

There's photo proof that at least 1 Rafale was shot down. There's a photo of Rafale tail wreckage BS-001, which means it was the first Rafale delivered to India. Last night there was already a video of a wrecked missile launcher and wrecked French MICA missile on the ground in front of a burning jet fighter. It was either shot down by HQ-9 (Chinese S-300) SAM, or JF-17 or J-10CE jets with PL-15 (Chinese long range air to air missile). Chinese missiles took out France's top fighter jet.

Funny thing is that the 2019 flare up between India and Pakistan, there was also fighter jet engagement. Pakistan said they shot down an Su-30MKI and an old Mig (bison?), and India claimed they shot down an F-16. The only proof was the Mig pilot was captured alive and later returned back to India. 2019 showed IAF that they needed "better" fighter jets, they think Western Jets were the best, so they quickly went for the hyped up Rafales. Just like in Ukraine, NATO wunderwaffe has proven to be overhyped, and way overpriced, when matched against an equal opponent.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The world is about to find out if public industry or private industry is really the better way to build things when public industrial militaries go up against private industrial militaries.

So far it's not looking good for privatization. Unsurprisingly

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 24 points 1 day ago

World War One was a struggle between the old feudal systems and the newer, capitalist modes of production. The capitalists won and the first socialist nation was born out of a crumbling monarchy.

I'm hoping all this isn't a precursor to another world war and things de-escalate. The contradictions of capitalism are becoming impossible to reconcile and it seems like it's trying to take the world down with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Theory: just like in Ukraine, part of the goal is to draw out military capabilities and see how they perform. Russia did everything it could to limit advanced tech deployment in the beginning of the SMO to avoid showing all its cards, but the US still gained valuable Intel on Russian capabilities. If my theory is correct that this flare up is being directed by the US, it could be partially to get Intel on the field performance of Chinese weapon systems.

[–] CommCat@hexbear.net 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

France would not allow their best fighter jet to get shot down by China's mid range fighter jets, just so Uncle Sam could get some information on Chinese military hardware. It's a major blow to the reputation of Dassault (Rafale Manufacturer). Western military tech sales are hyped up because of their real world success on the battlefield, but they've always been picking on weaker armies.

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Would France have any power here? The issue is whether or not India attacks Pakistan. What happens afterward is all data. My conjecture is the US has a vested interest in India attacking Pakistan, that this flare up was engineered by the US, and I am trying to understand what the US gains from it as a way of analyzing my hypothesis

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

China also wants to know if their equipment performs as expected. It has, maybe even exceeding expectations.

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 day ago

I didn't think China would be pushing for a conflagration to test their systems though

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] D61@hexbear.net 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nukes goin' off to the left of me,

Nukes goin' off to the right.

Here I am, cooked in the middle with you...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fighting between two nuclear powers. Not worrying at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›