this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
177 points (99.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6455 readers
119 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This post uses a gift link which has a view count limit. When it runs out, there is an archived copy of the article

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] celeste@kbin.earth 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Still, she took a more cautious approach to climate activism until she retired in 2021. “As a working GP, I didn’t really want to do anything that was arrestable . . . Maybe I retired a bit earlier as part of my wanting to do more for the climate.”

In November 2023, she was arrested and charged under the newly introduced offence of interference with key national infrastructure, which carries a maximum sentence of 12 months imprisonment, for taking part in a so-called slow march on Waterloo Bridge.

I appreciate that they're going into this prepared to get arrested. And now they're like "fuck it." It's weird people reading thw article seem to get the impression these specific women have sat on their butts their whole lives. Am I missing something? What should these specific women do differently?

[–] u_u@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

Holy shit yes. What is wrong with these comments. The first thing in my mind was how amazing that these older women are going out and about trying to protect the environment for future generation when they could be enjoying their retirement, but apparently some people don't like it because of... What?

[–] kapulsa@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They're doing the right thing now. That is what matters. I'm really impressed. They could just chill and enjoy the rest of their lives. Instead, they are fighting for a better world for all of us, some even risking prison. We should all follow their example.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

this is the part that slays me about skeptics: it's your kids and grandkids. wouldn't you do anything for them? don't you love them?

what the actual fuck, over?

it's literally the only biosphere we have and we're treating it like we have a package of biospheres from costco unopened under the sink.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So they can preside over the end of all things and claim they did something, I guess.

[–] Girru00@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Do you think that retirees think theyll be around when shit hits the fan? Or are they trying to plant trees whos shade they wont enjoy?

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 4 points 4 days ago

lol, they woke up when it got too hot because their house was on fire, but they’re still in bed.

[–] bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net -5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Had they just started reducing emissions by 1%/year in 1993, none of this would be happening to begin with. The definition of too little too late.

[–] azolus@slrpnk.net 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This kind of bitterness and blame game is exactly what the ruling class wants us to engage in so we stay divided and don't fight back effectively. We must resist this narrative and unite with everyone who is willing to fight for a livable future.

[–] bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What are any of the neolib scum who created this whole situation doing to fight for a liveable future? Voting for Gavin!? YOU are part of the problem. Do BETTER neolib sheep!

[–] azolus@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago

Die Welt dreht sich nicht um euch und euren desolaten Staat.

[–] celeste@kbin.earth 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yup, but this is the world we got now. These ladies are risking more than I am, and that has me really considering what more I could do and what I'm willing to risk. We can mourn what we lost, but we can't go back in time.

[–] bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net -2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is the kind of Labrador dog logic that has cooperatively led us here like good boys. If we put the fear of GOD in these people in 1990... or 2000... "what better place than here? what better time than now?"

[–] celeste@kbin.earth 5 points 3 days ago

I can't figure out what you're trying to accomplish with any of what you're saying. good luck with whatever you're planning, though.

[–] Beastimus@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

Ok, but also, unless you've got time travel, talking about when we needed to start doesn't help anyone. Talking about what we need to do now, maybe.