blakenong

joined 1 day ago
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world -2 points 3 hours ago

I’m not super concerned with “things” and their value. If a person makes $1b a year and wants to buy a $1b yacht every year then they have a bunch of yachts. The point is that money went back into the economy. Now, if they have 2 and want to sell 2 for $2b all at once… sorry, no. There is a wealth cap.

The issue with Billionaires now is that money isn’t in the economy. The more they hold, the harder it is to get enough.

Greed is a horrible thing.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

My industry doesn’t strike. It wouldn’t work. BUT I hope that all works out for you.

However, striking only works for so long. And, with Trump as president, I doubt there will be much striking allowed once he changes those laws or just replaces you with people from the concentration camp.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 7 points 7 hours ago

I don’t want Elon must choosing what to install on government computers.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Well, inflation has made that more than 10 million, but yes I agree there is a number that says “I own a huge mansion, 10 cars, a yacht, and I eat caviar every meal.” That number is significantly less than a billion without having to work a day more.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 8 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

One single billion at any one time is more than any one person should have. There really should just be a cap. Like, 999,999,999 is the highest your bank account can get, anything after that just flows into public programs.

The game Zelda: A link to the past had a max capacity of 999 rupees (money). If you picked up more, nothing happened. That’s how life should be.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 1 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

When you do it, I’ll do it. But I’m not wasting my life if it’s not a community effort.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Well, you’re not wrong. But Trump will make things over there (and locally) significantly worse in the long run. Yes, worse than it is now. All the while talking about progress, and how much better things are.

In the end, all the land will be handed over to Israel, and developers will turn it into a resort town. Anyone left alive will be a servant to the wealthy.

And my hope was “could be pressured” as opposed to “no chance in hell.” We cut our nose of to spite our face.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 2 points 8 hours ago

That is certainly possible, but any involvement from him would have been because he wanted to gain personal wealth or power. I’m sure you know this, but people need to remember that anything that Trump is doing to hold Israel in check has nothing to do with helping Gaza or the Palestinians. He doesn’t care. I do think that he’s very interested in developing on that land. If you recall, a while back there was something going around about Jared Kushner being involved with development in Gaza. I’m not sure what came of that and I don’t remember the exact details.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Oh that’s for sure.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Trump didn’t do anything. He has no control over Israel. He did nothing for this cease fire. I’m sure he would love to take credit one day and not the next.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 6 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

What’s changed is all hope for cancelling weapons to Israel is gone. Kamala, while certainly not a great option, could at least be pressured.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 3 points 13 hours ago

I feel this word choice was bad.

view more: next ›