She is the beacon of hope for humanity. She stands for the values that represent the best in us. And she not only tells us how it is, she leads the way.
kapulsa
That would be amazing. Unfortunately, there will very likely be no aliens to do it. We'll have to do it ourselves.
Very good. We should all join/support them.
Müsste die Mutter nicht jetzt 19 sein, damit sie in 6 Jahren 25 sein wird? Dann wäre sie aber nur 20 Jahre älter als das Kind.
m=21+k
m+6=5*(k+6)=5k+30
-> m=5k+24
-> 5k+24=21+k
-> 4k=-3 (wenn die Mutter 20 Jahre älter wäre, wäre hier 4k=-4, also k=-1)
-> k=-3/4=-9 Monate
Also "genau" zur Zeugung (wenn man von exakt 9 Monaten bis zur Geburt ausgeht).
Just like the blue whales, they are now turning silent as their natural habitat is dying.
Dies ist fein.jpg
Wie ich kommentiere (meistens)
You will probably like this
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess960
There have already been championships and magnus carlsen is a great supporter of this version.
Danke für deinen Bericht!
Ist die neue Bauart bequemer als die alten?
Agree with all points except the availability of plastic.
There might have been more wood, but the mass of plastic is enormous. I remember that it's more than the mass of all animals. The value should be from this study, but it's closed access, so I can't check.
They are, of course, right in their statement. But why do all those scientists still believe that one more statement will do any good? We've had 6 IPCC reports and thousands of papers and guides for policy makers and such. We do not have an information problem, we have an action problem. If they want to stand for science, they need to actually stand and not just write. It's ironically rather unscientific to keep doing things that have not worked in the past.
They should look at Peter Kalmus, for example. He's doing good.