Nothing people do has zero impact. But pretty much everything else has a bigger one. Coal will utterly destroy the land, and the gases emitted after it burns will destroy far more.
Solar like this on a few percent of the land will supply all the electricity people need. So it looks huge, but is surprisingly low-impact compared with other options, or things like raising cattle
What I'm seeing is that I get a paywall the instant I scroll past the end of the article. Is that what's happening for you?
I prefer to give people space to change who they are and how they vote.
They know who butters their bread
Though I'll note that the dependence is somewhat limited; the US has been a net oil exporter for several years.
I only see the paywall on other articles. Does your browser or lemmy instance remove the token from the URL?
Do you have a browser extension or lemmy instance which strips the token out of the URL? Because I'm definitely not hitting it
Top-level link is a gift link, so you shouldn't be hitting the paywall to begin with.
They're nutty, but not quite that nutty
There are ice vests for workers already. Not fun to have to use .
People hear about the chemtrails conspiracy theory, look up, see contrails, and then blame them for their cat doing something weird, being attracted to the same sex, headaches, etc because of the conspiracy theory. Some basic knowledge helps avoid that, hence the website describing contrails.
Three options: