this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
41 points (95.6% liked)

Futurology

1816 readers
166 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A battery is not generation so...

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Unsure if you’re responding to something that isn’t showing on my post BUT, had you read the article you’d understand that the battery stores and provides as much energy as the coal fire plant could produce, but faster.

Meaning they can use more efficient energy sources and use excess power generation to charge the battery rather than lower production because it would be a waste.

Coal fire plants, as I understand it, are useful because they can bring power online fast. This battery serves that purpose now.

And now you know, so you don’t have to go talking from a position of ignorance.