this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
68 points (98.6% liked)

Futurology

2422 readers
194 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Espiritdescali 1 points 3 weeks ago

I got that reference!

[–] Lugh 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

According to the scientists, knowledge about the role of NEAT1 methylation in the recognition and repair of DNA damage could open up new therapeutic options for tumors with high NEAT1 expression. However, it must first be clarified whether these results, which were obtained in simple cell systems, can also be transferred to complex tumor models.

I wonder is AI developments can speed up this process of going from lab to (hopefully) a therapeutic treatment that is available.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Short answer, no. Long answer, nooooooo.

Really though AI is nowhere near the media hype as it currently exists. AI can help certain analysis or attempt predictions but it can't do experiments. Automated lab systems are expensive and finicky as hell and not cross compatible to the point that even industry doesn't use them too much. Academia supported primarily by NIH, getting gutted by Republicans so expect it to take even longer assuming this lab manages to stay funded and extant through this administration.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, I doubt Bavarian academia would be supported by a US agency or primarily affected by the US government implosion.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There are domino effects.

The NIH supports global research especially in the context of clinical trials. Already Germany and other European countries are having to increase defense spending which means budgets being squeezed elsewhere. There are also scientists moving out of the US to places with less anti intellectual tendencies like Germany. That means more competition for funding in Germany.

Just because there's no direct effects doesn't mean there are no effects.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 weeks ago

That's what I was saying by "no primary effects". I'm not saying that an attack on academia in the US is not an attack on academia everywhere. I'm just saying that the comment seemed to presume that all research everywhere is primarily funded by the US.