this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
199 points (95.9% liked)

PC Gaming

9575 readers
872 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 2 hours ago

Who cares what teens want?

They don't have any money.

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I enjoy well-done romance in games. It's just a taste thing.

[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 1 points 10 minutes ago

Does that exist?

What's your fave?

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

Been saying this for a long time now. Romance in video games is about as batshit-cringy as it gets and is a tremendous waste of time that could have been used to add meaningful content or fix stability issues/bugs instead.

[–] sumguyonline@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

I as a video game enthusiast do not want my character to experience romance. It doesn't happen in real life the way it is portrayed in media, and it's fucking boring seeing it over and fucking over again. Gimme tragedy, gimme a problem I can solve, a mystery, or a war to fight. But romance, and sex, have not a damn place in those things. Developers of apparently every damn media have gotten it drilled into their heads that we want to read, watch, play thru, and otherwise experience their mental masturbation. Well I for one, don't fucking want to experience it at all. Gimme a story, and if you can't do it without pointless sex scenes then you don't have a fuckin story, you have a story about fuckin.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 14 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 1 points 5 minutes ago

Well this is funny sex humor

Not romance

This is the same thing TV shows figured out ages ago: you give people a flirty relationship and it's generally fun to watch. You turn that flirting into an actual relationship and it's boring + usually some fan service where the authors of the show try to get their female coworkers as naked as they can be manipulated into getting. And then they always need to make that same female coworker get pregnant and force her to fake giving birth.

Tldr it doesn't matter what the fans want, authors are fucking pervs.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

1000% agree.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 15 points 8 hours ago

I dunno. problems, mysteries, and war aren't usually portrayed realistically in video games, either.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago

that's only true because most of you motherfuckers do robotic gamified romances that don't feel natural, heartfelt or interesting.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

bg3 was literally one of the biggest games of the year....

also the sims 4 has been going for years

[–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 2 points 57 minutes ago

The romance was the worst part of BG3, imo.

Too forced, every dialogue option is either slightly flirty (at least) or just telling them "fuck you and die".

Even when you say you just want friendship and avoid the most flirty options, it won't stop the game from trying to throw you in a romance. I hated that.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Bets that it wasn’t because of the romance.

[–] ArcticFox@lemmy.ca 22 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

As usual big business trying to figure out a cookie cutter formula to repeatedly make billions in profit. But games are creative, not formulaic.

[–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah it’s too bad their formula isn’t “what if we made a good game?”

[–] ArcticFox@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

That's not how senior management approvals work. You're not allowed to pitch an opinion. Youre only allowed to make recommendations based on something that previously worked or if it's a direct request by multiple users in an official feed back form. Why do you think there is no creativity in AAA games, they call it "data driven decision making".

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

I really enjoyed my Shepard and Liara romance during the Mass Effect trilogy, but I don't think it's particularly well executed in most other games.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 11 points 11 hours ago

Romance in video games is fun, yeah, but it's usually just something extra. It's rarely the main focus and I'm hard-pressed to really imagine how to make it the main focus without making a gooner game. Usually romance/sex is sort of the cherry on top of an otherwise good game.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 88 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You’re starting on the wrong end.

People want games that the devs care about making. Whether it has sex or friendship or romance or relativistically-accurate jiggle physics.

People don’t know what they want until it’s in front of them, but devs know what they wanna make.

[–] Qwazpoi@lemmy.world 25 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think you hit the nail on the head with those points.

I've seen 5+ clones of Papers Please. I doubt that if you surveyed people describing the mechanics that they would be interested especially if Papers Please never came out.

For the original Halo they surveyed people who played who pretty much universally described the AI on the harder difficulties as being significantly "smarter". In actuality the only thing changed was enemies health pools and damage output and it was identical AI.

Gamers usually have a holistic experience with the games they are playing. There's definitely a place for user feedback to work, but devs don't look at a game the same way that people playing them do. Asking people who don't know how something works for feedback will give you perspective, but it doesn't necessarily lead to informed design decisions.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 9 points 13 hours ago

"I've seen 5+ clones of Papers Please. I doubt that if you surveyed people describing the mechanics that they would be interested especially if Papers Please never came out."

I think this is a great example. You can't distill things down to a formula because these things exist in conversation with each other. An example that comes to mind is the game "Not Tonight", a Brexit themed Papers Please clone. Mechanically, it does very little to distinguish itself from papers please, but narratively, that's sort of the whole point: It being a clone specifically leverages the energy of "Glory to Arstotzka" to satirise the UK's institutional racism.

Surveys don't capture that games like this aren't just clones of Papers Please, they're actively in conversation with Papers Please

[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Now, I like a good romance here and there. Who doesn't?

That being said, games like Sonic 06 are very good examples of why romance isn't welcome in some places

[–] essell@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Oh really. And what do you think he's collecting all those rings for?

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 2 points 7 hours ago
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 31 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Maybe one day, someone in charge of making video games will ~~figure out~~ remember that compelling, unique, decently challenging and rewarding gameplay is the actual fundamental component of a video game, and that everything else is important, but ultimately secondary to that.

[–] Suppoze@beehaw.org 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Hmmm... Or, or, hear me out: what about you're some guy in some mysterious place, but here comes the best part: this time you have amnesia and you must shoot guns at monsters to uncover the truth?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kbal@fedia.io 135 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

That's right "industry execs" — you just need to turn down the romance by 40% and the sex by 15%, add 50% more friendship and 25% more adventure, control for the desired level of political correctness, add just the right variety of behavioural feedback loops, and you'll have a maximally profitable game.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 17 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

maximally profitable game

See, it really is just an algorithm that can be nailed down perfectly, and I've got an entire floor of statisticians and market analysts that agree it'll make me berjillions!!!1!!

Lpt: they're also telling me more statisticians and market analysts will help boost my numbers too! Jackpot!

-an executive, somewhere, in nearly every corporate office

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 107 points 22 hours ago (9 children)

Just because you really enjoy golf doesn't mean you want every movie to have a half-assed awkward golf game stuffed into it.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 24 points 19 hours ago

Actually. Sometimes it is. The actual problem is that you're trying to figure it out at all. If you're trying to engineer the perfect product, it will always be a shit game. Good games come from passionate developers who have an idea, not from board meetings and focus groups.

[–] evilcultist@sh.itjust.works 55 points 22 hours ago (8 children)

Big mainstream games that are heavy on sex, like Baldur's Gate 3, are a recent phenomenon.

Heavy on sex? Just which mods did the author install?

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 41 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's fairly accurate isn't it? Every single companion (bar Minsc and Jaheira - though the Jaheira romance was cut content) lusts for you with the uncomplicated ferocity of a hormonal teenager, some after having exchanged barely a sentence or two with you (looking at you, Halsin). There is a bear fucking scene, Mizora wants you for some reason and hell, you can even bang a god damn mind flayer.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 24 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

The bear-fucking scene will always be my answer to things like this.

You can't look at BG3 and go "yup, wholesome family fun for all ages"

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 25 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but you don't HAVE to fuck the bear.

Joking aside, if romance and sex aren't your thing, you as the player have control in most games to just not do those things.

[–] Renacles@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

The characters keep throwing themselves at you though.

It really sucks when I'm playing a game with my girlfriend and there is a half-naked demon lady trying to bang me despite me being an asshole to them in every interaction.

Baldurs Gate 3 is one of my favorites games ever, but I would enjoy it a lot more without the awkward horny stuff it throws in my face.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 12 hours ago

SIGNALIS is a game about romance and I loved it, it is one of my favorite relatively recently released games.

Maybe you're doing it wrong?

[–] Muffi@programming.dev 29 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I know it's anecdotal, but among my students (12-18 y/o), dating sims are extremely popular. Probably the most popular genre after battle royal games. I would definitely consider dating sims romance games.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 16 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Half-assed sex scenes (no pun intended) are probably worse than ones that are well done.

I still think a lot about one of the beats in a DA:I romance. But like... all the ones from DA:O were kind of bad. But also the one I played in DA:V was so PG-13 and sterile it wasn't any fun at all.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›