this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
566 points (97.2% liked)

196

16813 readers
2219 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
566
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 18 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) by hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

Guys, at this rate I don't think the revolution's going to happen anytime soon.

(page 2) 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 18 hours ago

The Left: Fractured Butt Hole. 😞

[–] mehdi_benadel@lemmy.balamb.fr 5 points 16 hours ago
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

As a leftist its also important to keep in mind we do differentiate between leftists who hold some opinions we disagree with compared to a Liberal who disagrees with us on nearly everything. Especially when said Liberals demand to be treated like leftists yet support imperalism, genocide, apartheid, capitalism, bigotry, and yet constantly call people "fake leftists" or "tankies".

[–] verdare@beehaw.org 7 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

Maybe I’m in a bubble, but I have yet to see anyone who’s not genuinely a tankie being accused of such.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 31 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

You had me until "tankies". Tankies are scum and don't need defending.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 21 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It's not about defending tankies it's about people who are constantly shifting the focus of conversation to the most mockable section of online lefties.

The ruling class don't waste their time distancing themselves from qanon, they focus on furthering their class interests and emiserating the poor.

Liberals who are constantly calling people tankies are helping the ruling class.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not taking cues from the far-right in not denouncing our worst aspects when I see them and letting them take up shop in our spaces. I don't see the need to whataboutism to them either and will call that out, but I don't want them in spaces I'm in either.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

No one's defending tankies, nor saying we shouldn't call them out. The original commenter was saying liberals call all manner of leftists "tankies" when they actually aren't in order to derail them.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

The next commenter stated: "The ruling class don’t waste their time distancing themselves from qanon, they focus on furthering their class interests and emiserating the poor." Distancing themselves includes calling them out. So it sounds to me like they're saying we need to be pragmatic like the ruling class and not distance ourselves from tankies, which is absolutely not something I'm ever going to do for those slimeballs. Actively doing it like some sort of performance apropos of nothing? Sure, maybe not. But if a tankie ever tries to associate with us, they need to be given the boot over their disgusting ideals.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm saying the need to instantly and constantly denounce tankies is tedious and counterproductive. I'm saying that policing the boundaries of leftism based on dumb shit said online is a reactionary distraction.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

It's a common strategy used to distract from the core issues. It's like when supporters of israel go "but do you condemn hamas?!" or "oh, I notice you don't criticize hamas as much (therefore you must support them)"

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I feel like you thought they were disagreeing with you, when they were pointing out the hypocrisy of Liberals but I dunno...

You cant use your favorite strawman argument? How sad

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Forester@pawb.social 14 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

It's a political slang word. It refers to those who support leftist authoritarian regimes such as communist, China. Regimes where the state can do no wrong and the people do all the wrong so the state must step in to crush the people and "protect them" from dangerous, Western and capitalist ideas. Pretty sure the name derives from the 1989 tiananmen square incident.

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The term has nothing to do with Tiananmen square and it's usage actually predates the massacre by almost 40 years.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 10 points 16 hours ago

Yeah you're right. I was for some reason conflating the USSR invading Hungary

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

And how do we do that?

This is the internet, everyone is as anonymous as they want to be. Lots of people find these posts by browsing by All, so they're not likely to be aware of (or care about) the rules for a particular instance. If a Liberal and a Leftist wander into the same community, it can be hard to tell them apart unless they've made politics their whole identity.

Its pretty simple, do you support genocide?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί