this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
518 points (96.9% liked)

196

16813 readers
2758 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
518
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 16 hours ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago) by hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

Guys, at this rate I don't think the revolution's going to happen anytime soon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

As a leftist its also important to keep in mind we do differentiate between leftists who hold some opinions we disagree with compared to a Liberal who disagrees with us on nearly everything. Especially when said Liberals demand to be treated like leftists yet support imperalism, genocide, apartheid, capitalism, bigotry, and yet constantly call people "fake leftists" or "tankies".

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

yet support imperalism, genocide, apartheid, capitalism, bigotry

Yeah as a liberal I resent this. Im against all of these things except that I believe that the world is capitalist and would probably not be really any different even with a sudden communist takeover. Power corrupts any system just like it always has so you need safegaurds and checks that our system did have until everyone decided to throw out baby with the bath water

There are ideas i like that are communist(social programs, centralized production, not a huge fan of not owning my own stuff, but i dont think businesses should really own land), but i believe there is a lot of resistance to it and a slow burn towards utopia is a more fruitful endeavor.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 13 minutes ago

Have you heard of Market Socialism?

[–] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It's a strange state of affairs, there is a right wing recruitment pipeline deticated to making fun of liberals for being "cringe but also wrong"™.

An interesting experament you can do, replace "leftist", "the left" and "liberal" with "SJW" (swap the insider and outsider language) and ask yourself how much and in what interesting ways does the sentimate of the post change.

[–] verdare@beehaw.org 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe I’m in a bubble, but I have yet to see anyone who’s not genuinely a tankie being accused of such.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago

I've seen conservatives lob the word tankie around before like they do with other scary sounding political words. But not here on lemmy. "Tankie" has a very precise meaning on lemmy that everyone here seems to understand, despite a few tankies trying to gaslight people into thinking the term has "lost it's meaning".

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Ive seen people be called tankies for not supporting Kamala and opposing Liberal Democracy

[–] verdare@beehaw.org 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

for not supporting Kamala

That’s wild. I’ve never heard that take and have a difficult time believing that it is common.

opposing Liberal Democracy

What alternative were they in favor of?

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That’s wild. I’ve never heard that take and have a difficult time believing that it is common.

World users were literally calling anyone who critiqued Kamala Russian bots, were you not paying attention for the last several months?

What alternative were they in favor of?

Depends, some leftists support a workers democracy, im personally an Anarcho Syndicalist

[–] verdare@beehaw.org 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

World users

Ah. I think I see where the problem is. I believe my instance defederated from lemmy.world a while back.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 minutes ago

You arent missing out on much

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 33 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

You had me until "tankies". Tankies are scum and don't need defending.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 5 hours ago

You cant use your favorite strawman argument? How sad

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 20 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's not about defending tankies it's about people who are constantly shifting the focus of conversation to the most mockable section of online lefties.

The ruling class don't waste their time distancing themselves from qanon, they focus on furthering their class interests and emiserating the poor.

Liberals who are constantly calling people tankies are helping the ruling class.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not taking cues from the far-right in not denouncing our worst aspects when I see them and letting them take up shop in our spaces. I don't see the need to whataboutism to them either and will call that out, but I don't want them in spaces I'm in either.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No one's defending tankies, nor saying we shouldn't call them out. The original commenter was saying liberals call all manner of leftists "tankies" when they actually aren't in order to derail them.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

The next commenter stated: "The ruling class don’t waste their time distancing themselves from qanon, they focus on furthering their class interests and emiserating the poor." Distancing themselves includes calling them out. So it sounds to me like they're saying we need to be pragmatic like the ruling class and not distance ourselves from tankies, which is absolutely not something I'm ever going to do for those slimeballs. Actively doing it like some sort of performance apropos of nothing? Sure, maybe not. But if a tankie ever tries to associate with us, they need to be given the boot over their disgusting ideals.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'm saying the need to instantly and constantly denounce tankies is tedious and counterproductive. I'm saying that policing the boundaries of leftism based on dumb shit said online is a reactionary distraction.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

It's a common strategy used to distract from the core issues. It's like when supporters of israel go "but do you condemn hamas?!" or "oh, I notice you don't criticize hamas as much (therefore you must support them)"

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I feel like you thought they were disagreeing with you, when they were pointing out the hypocrisy of Liberals but I dunno...

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Forester@pawb.social 14 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

It's a political slang word. It refers to those who support leftist authoritarian regimes such as communist, China. Regimes where the state can do no wrong and the people do all the wrong so the state must step in to crush the people and "protect them" from dangerous, Western and capitalist ideas. Pretty sure the name derives from the 1989 tiananmen square incident.

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 18 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The term has nothing to do with Tiananmen square and it's usage actually predates the massacre by almost 40 years.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 10 points 14 hours ago

Yeah you're right. I was for some reason conflating the USSR invading Hungary

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

And how do we do that?

This is the internet, everyone is as anonymous as they want to be. Lots of people find these posts by browsing by All, so they're not likely to be aware of (or care about) the rules for a particular instance. If a Liberal and a Leftist wander into the same community, it can be hard to tell them apart unless they've made politics their whole identity.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 5 hours ago

Its pretty simple, do you support genocide?