this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
693 points (98.5% liked)

News

23627 readers
2423 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Did... did I just slide to a parallel universe? Do I get to meet Jerry O'Connell? What the hell is going on?!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 2 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 50 seconds ago)

I'm wondering if we're in the process of seeing the parties flip tbh. It seems like D's are becoming more conservative and R's are now trying to make systemic changes. Granted it's not a perfect flip and R-progressiveness is more like going backwards at times (abortion) but things feel weird now.

  • D: Trying to maintain (aka conserve) the status quo. Haven't been truly progressive for decades. Doesn't seem to understand why they lost to the dumbest man alive (and/or a mad dictator, depending on how things go) in 2024.
  • R: Got suddenly forced into populism by Trump's surprise win and staying power. "Anti-Elites" is now their calling card. Their status quo rich politicians are all being forced out.
[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 3 points 52 minutes ago

Bannon is the cackling villain.

He knows the system is fucked. He knows he's fucked. He knows you know it's fucked and there's no reason to hide anything.

If Starscream slicked his hair back and had a thing for Johnny Cash's wardrobe, you'd have something close to Bannon.

[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago

Exept Musk I assume. Or Trump. Or any other fascist fuck.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 38 points 11 hours ago

This is a 1932-type realignment, if we do this right

Guys, he's not talking about the re-alignment in America in 1932...

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 49 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

This reminds me of a manifesto I was reading for a proposed proletarian-run state. Comes from early 1900s, before the world went to shit because of the rise of fadcism. Particularly a few key points from their 25-point plan stood out to me:

  1. Abolition of unearned incomes [passive income, in today's terms]. Breaking of debt (interest)-slavery.
  1. In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice of life and property that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment due to a war must be regarded as a crime against the nation. Therefore, we demand ruthless confiscation of all war profits.
  1. We demand nationalization of all businesses which have been up to the present formed into companies (trusts).
  1. We demand that the profits from wholesale trade shall be shared out.
  1. We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare.
  1. We demand the creation of a healthy middle class and its conservation, immediate communalization of the great warehouses and their being leased at low cost to small firms, the utmost consideration of all small firms in contracts with the State, county or municipality.
  1. We demand a land reform suitable to our needs, provision of a law for the free expropriation of land for the purposes of public utility, abolition of land rent and prevention of all speculation in land.
  1. We demand struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, profiteers and so forth are to be punished with death, without consideration of confession or race.

[...]

  1. The state is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national education program, to enable every capable and industrious citizen to obtain higher education and subsequently introduction into leading positions. The plans of instruction of all educational institutions are to conform with the experiences of practical life. [...] We demand the education at the expense of the state of outstanding intellectually gifted children of poor parents without consideration of position or profession.
  1. The state is to care for the elevating national health by protecting the mother and child, by outlawing child-labor, [...]

Oops, wait, that's excerpted from The National Socialist Program

Yeah, it turns out Nazis have always been willing to use socialist rhetoric to appeal to the working class. They know what they're doing, but it's only a matter of time before what's determined to be for "the good of the workers" is coincidentally aligned with genocide and war and the greed of the ruling class..

TL;DR Nazis were always on board with taxing the rich... Until they didn't have any more competition, at which point it's back to oligarchy (and genocide, lots and lots of genocide).

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I was wondering with a few of those. Particularly number 18 is dropping fucking anvil sized hints. And knowing what to look for the rest fall neatly into line with their position against reparations and American government loans; their stance on veteran's care; and their conspiracy that corporations cost them world war 1, (this handily turned into Jews the second they needed corporate money).

So yeah I guess what I'm saying is you should definitely look the gift horse in the mouth. I learned this lesson as a kid in the 90's watching Newt Gingrich talk about how we need to do more to help poverty stricken and homeless children. I was nodding right along and then he got to his solution, workhouses. He even used an updated "Dignity of Work" line about how they'll learn useful skills and be proud of themselves.

[–] el_bhm@lemm.ee 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Sooooo, current day russia?

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago

Ya, explains a lot tbh.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 40 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Oh snap the broken clock was right for once.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

He's talking about rich Dems / libs

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 11 points 15 hours ago

he's talking about The Jews

[–] turbulentMagma@lemm.ee 13 points 15 hours ago

You can increase the taxes. The hard part is making them pay it

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 140 points 23 hours ago

Bannon is an anger salesmen. Anger salesmen don't sell you somene else's anger, though -- they can't. Instead, they package up your own anger, and sell it back to you.

Bannon sees the the reaction people are habing to CEOs right now, slapping a big ol' bow on it, and selling it back to people.

[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 17 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I've been hate listening to his podcast. A lot of what he says would be considered pretty eft leaning. But then a lot of it is conspiracy minded. Honestly Lauren to his podcast, it's pretty unbearable, but he hates the elites as much as anyone here. It probably goes some way to understanding why trump won

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

But he and Trump are elites. Especially Trump. You really can't get much more elite than someone who owns a skyscraper in Manhattan with his name on it.

[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 1 points 58 minutes ago (1 children)

So is everyone they're competing against...

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago (1 children)

Who exactly do you think they're competing against? They won the election. They control all three branches of government. They're set to turn America into a one-party state.

[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 1 points 52 minutes ago

Sorry, I meant during the recent election

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Bannon is from an ultra-conservative Irish-heritage working class family. He has always - at least in public - been anti-elitist, although of course he was an investment banker for years

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Ok so he's either a very complex and deep person, or a fucking liar.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 183 points 1 day ago (13 children)

"This is a 1932-type realignment, if we do this right,” Bannon explained. “Look at the demographics that got us here – black, Hispanic, white, working class, all of it. If we deliver for these people, and I mean deliver in a big way economically, then this is a coalition that could last for 50 years.”

He added that loyalty to “crony capitalism” and “tax breaks for the corporations” could “squander” a unique moment in history.

Making the economy better is how Hitler got into power too. The irony in saying this could be a 1932 style realignment is not lost on me. Trump has also said he wants to go after his political opponents and put them in prison. Also something Hitler did.

[–] timmy_dean_sausage@lemmy.world 106 points 1 day ago (12 children)

To expand on this for the unaware: Hitler came back into power for his second term in 1932. His first term, similar to trumps, was rife with turmoil and political/administrative blunders. One of the first things he did, upon returning to power, was a German version of The New Deal. They massively invested in their country's infrastructure and provided tens of millions of jobs for the young working class, who had been suffering the worst unemployment crisis in an age. For the first time in their lives, young Germans had good jobs (with great benefits) and were contributing towards building a better, cleaner, safer Germany, all facilitated by "the national socialist party". This was the part of nazi history that actually included socialism, and it's how the nazi party duped an entire generation into becoming their foot soldiers. They actually delivered substantive, positive change for the people, allowed people to get comfortable with the new status quo while they further built propaganda machines, then turned that status quo into a carrot on a stick. Young nazi's were very fearful of a backslide, so when nazi propaganda started saying all these bad people were trying to take away their newfound financial freedom, it was very easy to convince these young, relatively ignorant, working class people to "defend" the country they proudly built with their own hands.

If the GOP did a 180° on all of their economic policy, of the last 60+ years, to follow a similar story arc, I would be extremely concerned. With how down-trodden our 3 youngest generations are, the conditions for an American copy of nazi Germany couldn't be more perfect than they are right now.

I'm not a historian. I just read a book on this subject recently. Feel free to correct or add to anything I got wrong/missed!

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 31 points 1 day ago

And just like that, Steve Bannon learned about all the structures of liberal democracy that have thus far been stopping crony capitalism from squishing him like a worm on the sidewalk.

There’s a reason he isn’t hosting his little podcast in Russia or Algeria. He’s not 1% of strong enough to survive without the cushy protection afforded to white men in America who are broadly aligned with the rich people.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 42 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

He's just talking nonsense though. There is zero chance Trump will tax the billionaires overall. They paid him off, they own him.

But possibly of he's feeling particularly pesky, he might target people he doesn't like and target only them and pretend he did something meritorious.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Lmao it's like when the old white men become senile and slide to the right except Bannon is morally inverted.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 10 points 18 hours ago

First time I agree with Steve Bannon on anything, ever.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 day ago

I’ll tell you wants going on. He is saying the quiet part out loud.

He is admitting that conservatives have always known what would make the country better but refused to admit it, instead have always played “dumb” by claiming their free market and deregulation approach is what they honestly believe is best for the country.

I might be reading too much into it but imo this shows that decades of democrats playing fair and true to the process is why we got here. Because selfish people realized that they can take advantage of the benefit of the doubt and just ruin the government while pretending they don’t know any better.

Pretty evil, more than I actually expected from him tbh.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 106 points 1 day ago (9 children)
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

He knows exactly what he's doing. It's multiple groups of shitheads using each other to gain power, not just one big group of elites who are all trustworthy buddies.

My guess is that Musk will need to buy a merc army before he's able to establish his own nation in space. Might already have one.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There's a reason he's been having Tesla divert more resources to their Optimus robots. The man intends to have a machine army that he could use in a coup. We play our cards right and get behind cloning research, we could have a Grand Clone Army. 200,000 units now, with a million more well on the way. Begun, the Clone Wars have.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

At least then we'd finally live in a cool dystopian future.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Me and my friends walk into Musk's office

Mr. Musk, in the name of the Senate of the American Republic, you are under arrest.

Musk: Are you threatening me, Master Jedi?

Me: The Senate will decide your date.

Musk: I AM THE SENATE.

Me: Not. Yet.

Musk: It's treason, then.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

i love that shiteating grin on his face underneath this headline

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago
[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 18 hours ago

And hell just froze over.

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Sounds promising, except the “wealthy” he’s considering are probably in the 80k-250k bracket lol

Unless they’re targeting multimillionaires+, it’s not gonna work. The other half of this is that there needs to be an open and transparent process for keeping tracking of how taxes are spent

Edit but since it’s a bunch of kleptocrats in govt now, what to think of that? I guess rich progressives/dems/libs better make sure they’re using the same loop holes to conserve wealth that the conservatives will, otherwise it’s just playing a game rigged to kill you.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Rule of Acquisition #76: Every once in a while, declare peace. It confuses the hell out of your enemies.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"four months in prison and he's already starting to sound like a god damn liberal. we should ban prisons before more people are indoctrinated by the left."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

What the fuck is going on?

edit: this question was not literal

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›