this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
141 points (99.3% liked)

Futurology

1812 readers
198 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lugh 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Interestingly, they say testing has so far exceeded their expectations, and that they believe the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for this may be comparable to wind turbines. One of existing wind turbine technology's biggest drawbacks is limitations on location. This technology sounds like it would have far fewer problems with that. If it works, it may be able to dramatically broaden the places wind can create electricity.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

One of existing wind turbine technology's biggest drawbacks is limitations on location

I'm hopeful floating wind will go through a solar growth.

Once it becomes successful and factories made that can just pump them out on an assembly line things could be different.

But it is a matter of if that is possible and at what point someone is going to built an insanely expensive factory.

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 11 points 11 months ago

Pure dead brilliant so it is, but.

The subject matter is well outside my field of expertise, but I thrilled that Scotland is starting to make big gains in renewal energy development. There's some fantastic minds working in the oil and gas industry, and if we can get them to pivot towards green tech, we're in a fantastic position to hammer this forward for everyone's benefit.

Fingers crossed.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

The Wind Panel collects energy in smaller pockets, allowing it to capture gust and ground-effect winds that rotary turbines cannot.

sounds like this would be where its efficiency comes from.. as long as you can keep your ducts free of obstruction..

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago

I really wish there was more info on the cost of the new design. I know with turbines, cost efficiency is better for larger sizes. I would expect the “Wind Panel” would have similar cost/power scaling or are there other factors which make these cheaper?

[–] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

aerofoils that oscillate independently when exposed to the kinetic energy of wind and these mechanical oscillations are then converted to energy.

Kind of sounds like the same basic mechanism used for wave energy?

[–] ironeagl@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What does it sound like though?

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Like a card in a bicycle tire

[–] NotSpez@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Yes great but I am sure it will just cause cancer like any regular ol’ wind turbine. /s

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My initial impression of this tech is not so good. Wouldn't it be better higher up

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago

Something designed for use in the specific air patterns close to the ground would not be better higher up, no. That’s not how that works.

That’s what big wind turbines are for. And perhaps someday someone will make things designed to harness the high speed winds around tall buildings, but this thing designed to work in smaller gusts at or near ground level is unlikely to be it for a variety of reasons.