this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
457 points (95.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27162 readers
3129 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Anyway, please stay safe and don't be afraid to defend yourself.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FrostyTrichs@walledgarden.xyz 190 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Anyone who thinks they stand a chance against drones with a gun hasn't been paying attention to what's happening in Ukraine.

Gonna pew pew a CEO in the back? Sure, guns work for that.

Trying to save your own life against a fast and agile target that needs way less precision than you to be effective and probably never even presents a target? Nah mate, you're fucked.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 111 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (37 children)

There are some, handheld firearms that are used as a last-ditch / cheap anti drone solution in Ukraine, by both sides.

Drum roll.....

https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/army-news/2024/analysis-shotguns-emerge-as-a-frontline-defense-against-drones-in-evolving-military-and-security-tactics

Its shotguns.

Because they have a spread of multiple shot pellets instead of a single bullet.

Fucking obviously duh, they've been used to hunt small, evasive birds routinely, everywhere, for like 150+ years.

Hunting a nimble flying object with a sniper rifle is a laughably absurd idea.

This actual post from this woman is so stupid I would have thought it was from a 12 year old whose only experience with guns is from CoD... but nope, its a 50ish(?) year old woman.

Guess she's never hunted birds, and thinks its just the same as hunting deer or hogs or something???

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 47 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Shotguns just can’t stop winning

[–] Slab_Bulkhead@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"winning" and my dumb brain..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ive heard and seen some images and videos of soliders building their own antidrone ammo. They rip the tip off the casing and heat shrink a coulple of bbs together and crimp them to the casing. I'm not certain how legitimate or effective it is but I've seen several videos and images of it. They recomend staggering the homemade rounds with tracer rounds to help with aiming.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 31 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Now here's a thought... What about using drones to "take care of" a CEO? The risk of being caught would be lower, as you can be located hundreds of meters away or more. It's also relatively easy to acquire a drone, and you can make explosives with stuff you can buy at the hardware store.

(Disclaimer: This is just a thought experiment, I'm not dumb enough to try this, don't worry FBI :3)

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)
  1. Drones that weigh 0.55 pounds or more must be registered with the Federal Aviation Administration. If you buy a drone, you're supposed to register it, and that puts the drone and your name into a Federal database.

  2. Every electronic device with networking capability that exists has a "burned-in" MAC address that tells you info on the manufacturer, etc. This coupled with the drones serial number can narrow down specifically which device it was and allow law enforcement to figure out which specific store sold this specific drone. Then they hit the store with a warrant for the customers, match up the drone to a name, and go.

  3. Communications with commercially available drones are generally unencrypted and easily intercepted. Triangulation of the source of the controlling unit would be trivial.

It's sooooo fucking easy to find someone who is using a drone if you're serious about it. It just takes law enforcement being serious about it. Also, there's a good chance that since you have to register it with the FAA that any crime committed with it would be considered a Federal crime.

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 32 points 5 days ago (3 children)

You don't have to register it with the FAA; you're already going to murder someone, who cares if you break a few more laws?

The last point assumes someone's recording the wireless activity of the drone in the moments before the explosion, which I think is pretty unlikely. And the internals of the drone should be destroyed by the explosion, rendering it practically impossible to extract any identifying information other than the general drone model.

And even if all wireless traffic is being recorded and triangulated, pick a busy place and you're just one guy on your phone in a crowd of thousands. You can also order the drone anonymously months ahead of time and pick it up somewhere with poor security camera coverage to all but ensure there's no record linking it to you.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago
  1. They're supposed to be registered for use, but that's something YOU do, on the website. That's not done automatically as part of the purchase.
  2. Not all stores manage inventory at the serial number level.
  3. That requires them to be actively looking for it while you're flying. Once you turn off your transmitter there's nothing to track. Don't fly near restricted airspace and they have no reason to try to fine a random drone pilot.
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Register with the FAA? Lmao
Yes, yes. Let's also register our crime gun before we do the crimes with it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago (2 children)

More on this splendid human being:

In now deleted tweets from 2015, it’s clear Rep. Maddox has always held racist beliefs. In an October 2015 tweet, Maddox responded to someone calling President Barack Obama a “coon” by saying that “Obama is not black. He is of African ancestry, not sharing the Black American heritage or experience.” 

In a March 2015 tweet, Maddox said that “childhood sexual assault and neglect” was the reason for homosexuality and that she blamed the parents and LGBTQ people for their sexual preferences.  

In a January 2015 tweet she claimed Islam is a “faith about destruction” and that there are no Islamic “hospitals, orphanages or universities.” 

She's a genuine shit-person. 100% real human excrement propped up with modern technology to walk and talk sorta like a real human being!

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In a January 2015 tweet she claimed Islam is a “faith about destruction” and that there are no Islamic “hospitals, orphanages or universities.” 

do not tell her where the term algebra originated from

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DrownedRats@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

Fucking moron. You'll never hit a drone with that! The ruskies have been trying that for the last couple years with virtually zero success.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 47 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

Please, do NOT shoot at airborn targets, or any target where your are not certain a missed shot will safely land in an empty area.

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Also shooting down a drone counts as shooting down an actual airplane, which is like, a super felony. So probably just don't.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Knowing the golden rules? No, that sounds like communism or something.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 65 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Scoped gun for a drone OK yeah, you clearly know what you're doing.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And that bipod, expert gun believer right there.

[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)
  • Prone shooting position, check
  • Bipod firmly on the ground, check
  • Aim at drone overhead, shit…
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 46 points 5 days ago (2 children)

GovCo owns the drones. The simple fact that they haven't shot them down means they own them.

This is a distraction. It's to distract people because for some reason there was a sudden unexpected explosion of class consciousness.

Stop talking about the fucking govt drones. Keep scaring billionaires.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The one I saw a picture of was a manned helicopter. (Flying in a legal area too .. which is why they aren't being shot down near a military base, because if they were a threat, in air they weren't allowed to fly in... They would be intercepted or shot down)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 50 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I'm not a gun person, but it seems to me like anyone who claims they can shoot down a drone with a rifle is also revealing themselves to not be a gun person.

load more comments (3 replies)

New Jersey people need new glasses...

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Aliens are not attacking.

The drones have hurt no one.

They are merely paying more attention now.

Perhaps if society kills more CEOs, they will finally consider us sapient and establish contact.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 41 points 5 days ago (1 children)

All she has in her house are succulents? That makes sense. They're literally the only things someone like her could possibly hope to keep alive. They need almost zero attention, maintenance, or moisture.

Just like her brain.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CetaceanNeeded@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

This is all BS anyway but a rifle is very much the wrong weapon against a drone...

[–] RedC@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago

Dumbass gun owners, sending rounds into unsuspecting people since 1364

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 26 points 5 days ago

If it flies, it spies

Birdwatching goes both ways

c/birdsarentreal

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 33 points 5 days ago (6 children)

shes more likely to die at the end of that gun than a drone. but only if you go by reality, statistics, etc.

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

Or some bystander of shooting into the air.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 days ago

This bitch gonna shoot down actual manned aircraft, judging by the reports

[–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 28 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

Goodness me, what hate does to people. She was born in 1987 but looks like she could well be in her 50's.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago

She's younger than me?!? Jesus Christ.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

She couldn't dope a scope if her life depended on it

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

It's a shame that politics have gotten us old women with sniper rifles in the most ugh way possible. Come on we could have grandma shooting ceos, but instead it's a upper middle class woman vice signaling her love of violent solutions ro problems that need thinking

[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)

There's no way she could hit a drone with a rifle

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why is she in the kitchen?

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 47 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's where conservative women belong

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You'll notice a lot of videos made by conservative groups featuring women happen to be filmed in Kitchens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 12 points 5 days ago
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I swear, that picture and her profile look AI generated. That smile... WTF.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›