this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
-2 points (41.7% liked)

Futurology

1852 readers
87 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
voidx
Lugh
Espiritdescali
AwesomeLowlander
-2
Generative AI can’t shake its reliability problem. Some say ‘neurosymbolic AI’ is the answer. (fortune.com)
submitted 1 week ago by BaylorSwift3 to c/futurology
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

We can’t seem to escape from the AI dumpster that we are living in.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

LLMs are fundamentally not designed to be reliable. That is not how they work. That is not the function they optimize. That is not the problem they solve.

You're making a fish climb trees.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah. I've been around long enough to recognize a buzzword driven tech fad when I see one.

[–] zib@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Or, and hear me out, perhaps we could dump this mess and move on to the next tech fad?