Ask Lemmy

Realistically, a lot of the stock photo industry. If a few people can generate pictures on demand, you won't really need anyone doing sets, lights, wardrobe, etc for a series of generic photos .

Scammers. They are so stupid. AI is much more convincing.

None.

None, as long as society uses labor as a means to secure basic necessities. Shifting that towards some infinitely-scalable capital equipment owned by entities kinda fucks the whole system, don't it?

Jobs that are done in environments that are dangerous for humans. Or at least make these jobs safer for humans.

I’m not sure which jobs this will entail, but if a technology is able to reduce dead people on the job I think it’s a good thing.

Requirements revision review. It is the most mind-numbing part of my job and fortunately only a small portion of it.

A word changes, even just punctuation changes, can change the meaning drastically. And finding that change within a hundred page document is a task humans just plain suck at. Get a computer to compare revision A to revision B, highlight the changes, then pass it on to the human to interpret the change and decide what to do from there.

(UK) Government.

It could not be any worse than the most-obvious self-serving pocket-liners of this century.

none. it may help with under staffed areas for them to function a bit but it really is no good to do things on its own.

None. Maybe some middle management, but even then, until AI fixes the hallucinations for good, in useless

Groundskeeping.

Currently very few jobs should be replaced with AI. But many jobs should be augmented with AI. Human-in-the-loop AI amplify the finate resource of smart humans.

The only full job I can think of is assistant to a busy person. I don't think any whole jobs are done better by ai. Some of the jobs recommended in this thread would be better to be removed rather than replaced.

So, I think ai makes a better assistant to a person doing a job rather than a replacement to compete a job on its own. It can write rough drafts that a talented writer can expand and edit. It can quickly generate several plans that an experienced leader can pick from or discard. It can look through a designer's portfolio and spit out "new" combinations of their past designs that the designer can then build upon.

Any one of these jobs could give up and submit the AI's output as their own, but I think the quality of the results would suffer.

Politician

None, not because it can't but because if it does then people won't be able to make an income. This is already a problem.