this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
468 points (88.1% liked)

linuxmemes

21355 readers
1975 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    468
    Windows VS Linux (lemmy.world)
    submitted 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) by trespasser69@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 3 points 23 minutes ago

    Install windows, run debloat powershell script. Done.

    Microsoft give no shortage of things to complain about with needing to exaggerate.

    [–] arc@lemm.ee 3 points 58 minutes ago (3 children)

    I don't even know what this graph is even supposed to mean. Bitch about Windows all you like but the installation process is typically very simple.

    [–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 4 points 27 minutes ago

    I guess it means that no one here knows what Windows Debloated is and didn't read far down enough to see regular windows marked as very easy to install.

    [–] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 7 minutes ago

    There is no X axis so I'm going to assume it means potatoes per guinea pig

    [–] scholar@lemmy.world 1 points 47 minutes ago (1 children)

    Boot off usb, create partitions, wait, spend five screens clicking 'no' on all of the options, unplug ethernet so it allows you to make a local account, wait, login, spend 15 minutes uninstalling all of the preinstalled nonsense, disable all of the advertising on the task bar and desktop, pretend the rest of the telemetry doesn't exist, download and install the latest drivers from each manufacturers website. Very simple.

    [–] Luccus@feddit.org 1 points 20 minutes ago

    Man. Last time I just wanted to check if my new laptop was working properly, so I booted up it's preinstalled Windows. I literally had to look up how to get Windows to get me into Explorer without creating an account or connecting it to my network.

    It took me about 25 minutes and Windows was already installed on the damn thing.

    It took 15 minutes from booting a prepared Fedora stick to logging in.

    I honestly believe that, by now, Linux is no more difficult than Windows. People are just not used to the differences.

    [–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 27 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    Biased as fuck lol. Installing windows is not difficult. I did it first time at the age of 8 witn WIndows 98 and their newer installers are made so the general public can do it. And the bloat and spyware? Thats windows dude. Its not meant to be your OS, its meant to spy on your ass at the benefit of being familiar and (relative) easy to use. Anything you do to it post clean install is your own tinkering. Linux distros are great yall, but install difficulty is not a metric I would use to attack windows. Comparing between distros makes sense.

    [–] dolle@feddit.dk 1 points 56 minutes ago

    It can be quite difficult for puzzling reasons. I bought my laptop with no OS because it was cheaper to buy a Windows license separately. I downloaded the ISO and put it on a USB drive and ... It wouldn't boot. It took me half a day and I had to follow guides with various black magic which I can't even recall what was about to finally get the thing to boot from USB. After spending over a day on that, I installed Ubuntu and set up dual booting in about 30 minutes.

    [–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

    This doesn't say it's difficult, just says there are others which are less difficult. Even if you accept everything at default, windows installs take much longer.

    I'm not sure why you even think this is an attack on windows really. You keep saying windows is for those who want easy to use, so why not include the whole process?

    [–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

    Longer != difficult. Windows installs are easy as fuck and id say its as simple as linux mint.
    The debloating is a choice and id say thats the same amount of work as installing stuff in linux because what it comes with is very limited.
    Im a linux mint user btw

    [–] arc@lemm.ee 1 points 53 minutes ago

    Linux has made leaps and bounds with usability and ease of installation but it's no better than any other modern OS - which is a good thing. Installing Windows from a USB stick is not difficult - the simple path is literally, pick a language, select your wifi, choose who is logging in, click install and go grab a coffee. About the only difficulty if you can call it one is that some installs will ask for a serial number because it's a commercial product.

    Also, the number of questions & buttons during installation is one thing but the certainty of a functioning system is another. Linux is better at supporting old hardware, Windows is better at supporting new hardware. Choose accordingly if that matters.

    [–] pavlo101@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

    I call bullshit. It only took me 3 hours to compile and install gentoo on my latest build and get proper desktop environment working. Granted I'm still tweaking the config files 4 years later, but it's perfect!

    [–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 38 points 7 hours ago (8 children)

    Windows requires pressing next 12 times, what are you people smoking and can I haz?

    [–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 17 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

    There's also a number of things you have to click "no" on, like a free trial office or Onedrive.

    It took me around an hour to set up my new Win 11 laptop, most of which was downloading and installing updates. I expected far worse.

    [–] arc@lemm.ee 2 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

    And downloading updates is a good thing. Means that the fresh installation isn't vulnerable to something that was fixed between when the USB / DVD was pressed and the time the person installed it.

    [–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 34 minutes ago

    Yeah, and you can wander off and do something else in the meantime.

    [–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 hours ago (9 children)

    Oh please, we spend an hour fucking around in a new Linux install to get things the way we like them too.

    [–] ftbd@feddit.org 4 points 2 hours ago

    No, see: some of us spend countless hours setting up their NixOS config repo, which is totally worth it because you save half an hour when moving to a new machine

    [–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 hours ago

    Thaaaaank you for being the fucking voice of reason

    [–] Limitless_screaming@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

    A new Linux installation is usually usable and you spend an hour tailoring it to your specific needs. While in a new Windows installation I spend the first hour remembering things that'll start popping up/executing in the background and disabling them just to get it to a usable state.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

    Getting Mint the way I like it takes about 20 minutes, including the install itself.

    Of course, I usually spend four or five hours trying other distros first, before eventually deciding on Mint.

    load more comments (5 replies)
    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] robocall@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

    Why do all my homies use Linux Mint while I use Ubuntu?

    [–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

    Cinnamon is nice. But then I meet KDE...

    Honestly, if you're happy with Ubuntu, don't worry about what other people think. A lot of the (valid) complains of Ubuntu require research to understand why to be outraged.

    I personally only use immutable now (bazite, aurora and steam OS) and I wouldn't have it any other way now.

    [–] tsugu@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 hours ago

    They might simply like Mint's Cinnamon over Ubuntu's GNOME. That's a valid choice.

    [–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago

    Because you're wrong?

    Personally I don't like snaps, is the main thing.

    [–] moon@lemmy.cafe 15 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

    As much as I wish this were true, this is in a bubble where Windows isn't already preinstalled on everything.

    [–] yonder@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 hours ago

    Unfortunatly, that's the reality of how computers are sold. If customers could try out both windows and Ubuntu at the store before buying and then got the variant with that OS preinstalled, I bet more people might use Linux, especially if they saved money by not paying for a windows license.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›