this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
688 points (97.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35562 readers
1546 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] relevants@feddit.de 164 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Grammar aside, it's an odd choice to fill up half the page with 747s if you want to showcase the variety of commercial passenger airplanes.

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 64 points 11 months ago

I'm more annoyed at the lack of anything prop.

Not everything is a international long haul.

[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 94 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It genuinely took me a while to see what was wrong with it, my brain was autocorrecting it

[–] Barack_Embalmer@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Many modern theories in cognitive science posit that the brain's objective is to be a kind of "prediction machine" to predict the incoming stream of sensory information from the top down, as well as processing it from the bottom up. This is sometimes referred to through the aphorism "perception is controlled hallucination".

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago (4 children)

So human thought is … text prediction?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] morganth@discuss.tchncs.de 83 points 11 months ago

See, I thought it was mildly infuriating because the images aren’t “many types of airplanes”, they’re only a few types of airplanes repeated at different sizes or different angles.

[–] Maddie@sh.itjust.works 46 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hai@lemmy.ml 39 points 11 months ago (4 children)

My brain autocorrected this for me, and I was confused why you were posting it at first.

This reminds me, there is a thing that the human mind can read horribly spelled words — as long as the general idea of it is the same (most of the time the end and beginning). I would try to find an example, but it’s late and my ability to form proper search queries os diminished.

[–] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Just invret two letters in a wrod that are not the first or the last. You will read just fine and prboably not even notice. Like this cmoment you just read

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 28 points 11 months ago

Disregarding the bad grammar, the picture shows a terrible variety of airplanes. They're all some sort of commercial passenger jet.

It's like saying, "there's so many kinds of motorcycles!" while showing only various Harleys. Let's just ignore the dirt bikes, sport bikes, and everything in between.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

What's wrong? They are many different kinds of airplanes. Why are they airplanes and not people, though?

[–] waigl@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Using "they" when you haven't yet established the group you are referring to in context feels weird and kinda wrong, especially if it's about a group of inanimate objects. It really looks like the word should have been "there", but they just mistyped and then didn't catch the error in the editing process or didn't bother to correct it.

That's what I think is wrong here. I'm not 100% sure that this grammatically wrong, but it sure feels like it. Might depend on what the page before this one said.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

It’s in a book for 5 years old to learn to read. It’s supposed to be simple words in simple sentences. This is not it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Should be “There”

[–] Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip 19 points 11 months ago

The issue is on both pages. Lack of knowledge of English on one, and lazy copy/pasta of similar airplanes on the other.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Is the issue that all the plains are basically the same kind of wide and narrow-body passenger jets? Like there is hardly any variety in the images?

[–] RAM@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 11 months ago (3 children)

the issue is with the text.

it says "they are .." instead of "there are ..."

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I had to look a second time. My brain just auto-corrected that.

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago

holy crap. I must have read it 3-4 times, STILL found nothing wrong, so I went to the comments. It took this comment train for me to see it, meaning you had to tell me literally what it was.

Human brains are so neat sometimes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PlutoParty@programming.dev 7 points 11 months ago

Buddy, we are talking about planes. But no, that isn't the issue.

[–] Bagel5941@aussie.zone 18 points 11 months ago (13 children)

TIL that aeroplane is commonwealth english.

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

No, "airplane" is simplified English, for simpletons

"Aeroplane" is fancypants English

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (5 children)

This ladies and gentlemen is an example of people using ai to make kid books. It's a big thing right now and easy money but could have consequence if kids start reading these at a young age.

[–] francisfordpoopola@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Don't try to redirect stupidity from people to computers. We're more than capable of doing stupid things without the help of our AI overlords.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ddhuud@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

No. AI wouldn't mess up like that. It could spew other kinds of shit, but with excellent syntax. It's far more likely for humans to make mistakes like that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] camelbeard@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They are so many good kind of AI written books nowdays

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Funny that as a non-native I’m less likely to make such a mistake than natives. At some point I had to learn the basics or something. Not that I don’t make mistakes

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Same here I’m French native. The there their they’re thing doesn’t affect me.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 15 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Probably went like: There are->There're->They're->They are

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BrownianMotion@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There are many kinds...

They are is incorrect, and the word "so" is superfluous.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (6 children)

That reminds me, why do so many people confuse "they're", "their" and "there"?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (8 children)

They are. What's the problem?

Like honestly, it's a simple present tense sentence, talking about those airplanes right next to it. They are so many kinds!

[–] Classy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago

I guess the problem is that, while technically accurate English, it's a pretty non-standard usage. One sees a page full of a variety of planes and it's expected that the following text will make a general statement on planes as an idea: There are so many kinds of planes!

To refer to a group as the book does, it's just kind of clunky and awkward, and on top of that so many kinds is, in my experience, just an unusual adjective form. Teaching children how to read isn't just about learning how to sound out words: it's also about how to suss out their meaning, and a child at this reading level may have a hard time understanding the more abstract grammatical form that this book decided to take.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 32 points 11 months ago (4 children)

"They" instead of "their."

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Can't tell if you're trolling

[–] hansl@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago

Ha. And now I'm crying/laughing. Thank you all.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 19 points 11 months ago

Honest mistake, but I wanna double down because its funnier that way.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

All airplanes are jetliners.

load more comments
view more: next ›