this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
173 points (98.9% liked)

Futurology

1813 readers
57 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShaolinRaiden@lemm.ee 42 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
  1. Amazon.com, Inc.
  2. Blackstone Group
  3. ExxonMobil
  4. Glencore
  5. Meta
  6. Tesla
  7. The Vanguard Group
[–] grue@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Blackstone Group

The Vanguard Group

It is way past time for voting rights for shares held in mutual funds to pass through to the mutual fund shareholder instead of being voted by the fund manager.

Companies like Blackstone and Vanguard don't own shit for themselves; they only manage it on behalf of others. But they disenfranchise those others while they do it, and that's entirely fucking unacceptable!

Blackrock get the voting rights for the shares they hold for funds though and always go with the status quo.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I mean, dystopian fiction has warned us about this for decades. Some of those companies are already more powerful than many nations, all we're still missing is the private corporate militaries. But something tells me we're real close to that reality as well.

As soon as more power can no longer be bought with cold hard cash, physical violence and power projection will inevitably follow.

[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Don't worry, they'll make them all suicide drones so it's not technically an army!

Flying precision bombs in private hands, a totally normal thing any business could reasonably expect to need and use for standard business operations.

If the founding fathers didn't want corporations to have suicide drones they would have mentioned it in the constitution /s

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Didn't Marx warn us about this?

[–] freeman@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hasnt Microsoft built a Nuclear power plant? There was a post about it in the last few days

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not built but they're restarting and leasing the Three Mile Island reactor. You know, the one that almost caused Chernobyl 2.0 by partial meltdown.

What could possibly go wrong?

[–] freeman@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

That sounds fun

[–] zante@lemmy.wtf 10 points 2 months ago

Well the size and power is not novel. And smaller companies have been broken up before now. But that was a different era.

I think that not enough people make the connection between political donations and government policy.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Lugh 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

No shit

It's obvious to some of us, but not to many. Hence why it's so important to keep saying it. Particularly at a UN summit about the future.

[–] bbuez@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

UN summit

sponsored by shell

I jest

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago
[–] Doombot1@lemmy.one 5 points 2 months ago

shocked pikachu