this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
372 points (99.5% liked)

Futurology

1797 readers
59 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 96 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (18 children)

"The Ocean Cleanup" is a great effort and I support their mission wholeheartedly. BUT looking at the bigger picture; it seems completely asinine to fish garbage put of the ocean and call that the solution to pollution, instead of preventing it from getting there in the first place. This is not meant as a criticism of "The Ocean Cleanup", but of global society in general. One minute you see them removing the Pacific garbage patch and the next you see whole rivers covered in plastic waste flowing out into the ocean from certain countries.

Edit: Fishing it out of the rivers before it enters the ocean is also a good effort. But it doesn't address the underlying problem any better than cleaning ot out of the ocean. Also; some people seem to think I'm bashing "The Ocean Cleanup" and similar organisations. I'm very much not. They do great, necessary work. I'm just frustrated that said work is needed, and more importantly; that it doesn't seem to be on track to stop being needed anytime in the near-ish future.

[–] Luminocta@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They are doing similar tryouts in Big Rivers now too. But that's a lot harder than cleaning what's already stagnant.

The sheer force of the water and waste is difficult to hold in place with nets. But they're definitely working on it.

I trust programs like this and admire the work. It's a good thing for life in general to get rid of that shit. It's just abysmal that companies still use so much plastic for everything.

[–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No doubt it's good work, but the plastic shouldn't get in there in the first place. That was my only point.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 5 points 2 months ago

it shouldn’t, but realistically it will and given that it’s good to be able to clean it up

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

Climate is a thing where no matter how big your solution is, it's only part of a larger solution-cluster.

We need it all, and then the rest of it, too.

[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

[...] the next you see whole rivers covered in plastic waste flowing out into the ocean from certain countries.

Which is why they're working on exactly that

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] emiellr@lemm.ee 17 points 2 months ago

Except they're not calling it the solution, just a remedy to a literally growing problem. Even if people stopped polluting the ocean in an instant, you'd still have to clean up the patch. Now, they're taking the initiative to go clean it up as best they can, which is a heck of a lot more than the average person lemme tell ya that much.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 13 points 2 months ago

The majority of the great Pacific garbage patch material - over 75% of it - comes from fishing and aquaculture activities. I'm sure some of it is accidents or storm related, but I also have a strong suspicion that a good percentage of it is from China's ghost fishing fleets - the ones they deny exist, that over-fish and poach other countries' waters, and that cut loose their nets and pretend innocence if approached.

[–] sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Even if all pollution stopped today we still have to clean up the patch.

[–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Yes. That is why I said that I support them.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Who said it was a solution?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

It's important to celebrate the wins that we have in order to build some tailwind behind the general effort.

We should still recognize how far we have to go, of course, but celebration matters.

[–] Gumbyyy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Yeah. All product packaging should be paper based.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Where do they say anything like that? I've been following them very closely for years and they've always been super transparent that there isn't one solution. They also do a lot of work to prevent trash from getting to the ocean in the first place.

[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are groups working to cleanup river plastic before it becomes ocean plastic.

[–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It shouldn't be river plastic either though. That's just pushing the problem back a step instead of solving it outright. It's a step in the right direction, but it shouldn't end up in the rivers either...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

your reply is classic

miss the forest for the trees

[–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How in the heck do you mean? I'm happy for the accomplishment. It's excellent work. I'm just angry that said work is necessary in the first place.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I would not have had the opinion that you are happy about the solution. Your reply is basically "not appreciate a larger situation, problem, etc., because one is considering only a few parts of it" (the origin). We cannot fix the reason the problem is there. IT IS. Fixing the problem is the only reality and now that is within reach. Complaining about the origin is missing the point.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jesusaurus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

There are similar groups with near identical solutions for tackling "problem" River that are some of the worst offenders of plastic pollution.

Ultimately there is still a problem in the ocean, and to some extent, it is inevitable until we have a realistic solution for plastics.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 84 points 2 months ago (13 children)

Proving once again that every man-made problem on Earth can be solved through appropriate resource allocation, which is only hindered by those hoarding the wealth, and those in our governments whom they pay to protect their wealth from practical use.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not really a solution as it will be a perpetual requirement until we just stop putting out so much plastics

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

"Thus solving the problem forever."

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 months ago (4 children)
[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 41 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dammit now I have this picture in my head of two cleanup teams sneaking trash back into the other's ocean.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

I don't know why you think the British would want to remove their own landmass?

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think their idea is to put it into new plastic products.

[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So it can go back into the ocean.

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

So our planet will have a plastic cycle then? Sounds good enough for now.

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Gotta stay in business somehow.

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Outside the environment.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Ranta@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Claims 5, but says 10, by 2034...

It's like the second line of the article

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

I wonder if they figured out how to remove the garbage without hurting the blue sea dragons that are living in there.

Obviously the garbage has to get out of the ocean, I just remember that the last I heard about it a few years ago they had to stop because they were accidentally hurting and killing the very wildlife they're trying to protect. It's a shitty catch 22 we've created, but I hope they succeed. That garbage has been there too fucking long.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

...prompting conservatives to send even more garbage. "Ain't nuthin in the bible about cleanin up no oceans, you marxist satanists! That garbage patch is part of our heritage!"

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago

Nonprofit environmental organization the Ocean Cleanup has announced that it's on track to eliminate the Great Pacific Garbage Patch by 2034.

If it can get the necessary funds, that is. In a press release, the organization claimed that eliminating the patch once and for all would cost a whopping $7.5 billion

The title seems rather misleading. "We're on track if someone just gives us 7.5 billion USD" is a really big if. It doesn't seem like they are close to raising those kinds of funds either.

load more comments
view more: next ›