this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
159 points (99.4% liked)

Futurology

1739 readers
279 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 month ago

whaaaaaat it's not myyyyy fault that my AI that i created and prompted hacked the bank and embezzled all the moneys into my own accounts

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This looks like it would kill any open source AI. The only people with AI will be corporations.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago

that seems to be the goal of these corporations, yes

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

This is regulatory capture and will end up drying up the open source scene. OpenAI has been pushing for this for a long time with all their "AI is dangerous and we need regulations", and anthropic literally got caught sending a letter pushing for this bill specifically like a week ago.

This helps the big companies more than anything by giving them a huge moat and will guarantee us a shit censored product that can only be run on the cloud for our "safety".

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Define 'bad stuff'. The user of AI should exercise reasonable caution, and not deploy AI when it does not make sense.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Microsoft AI described reporter as perpetrator of crimes he covered over the years.

https://lemmy.world/post/18999733

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We have already had civil litigation against corporations trying to absolve themselves of AI faults, and in the airline case the airline was at fault.

https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20240222-air-canada-chatbot-misinformation-what-travellers-should-know

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And they lost because the airline used it in a stupid way that gave their customers false information in an official manner. The airline is the user in this context, this bill isn't about them.

This bill is akin to suing the company that supplied the bot (even if it was a free open source bot available to all) because the airline was dumb enough to use it in such a stupid manner, instead of the airline itself for its misuse.

AI is a tool, you don't go after the guy making hammers because someone used it on people instead of nails.