this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
151 points (96.9% liked)

Futurology

1812 readers
199 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

UBI: Yes.

Carbon taxes: Yes

Funding the former with the latter: Absolutely not, because the pressure to avoid the carbon taxes would end up underfunding the UBI.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Hypothecated taxes are tricky like that. I think they're underrated when it's essentially a user fee, but otherwise, no, it's an old-timey idea for a reason.

Fun fact, in Canada we have a carbon tax that goes right back out as cheques to people, kinda like this but at a lower rate. Currently getting rid of them is the leading candidate's whole platform

[–] PeteBauxigeg@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

The article seems really vague on how this would work

[–] anarchist@lemmy.ml -3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Oh wow DOUBLE the GEE DEE PEE?!?!?!?!!@! Hard rn