this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
583 points (99.2% liked)

News

32976 readers
2789 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He also said “ICE officials have told us that an apparent biometric match by Mobile Fortify is a ‘definitive’ determination of a person’s status and that an ICE officer may ignore evidence of American citizenship—including a birth certificate—if the app says the person is an alien. ICE using a mobile biometrics app in ways its developers at CBP never intended or tested is a frightening, repugnant, and unconstitutional attack on Americans’ rights and freedoms.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 115 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (12 children)

This reeks of bullshit by ICE, they can't verify citizenship from a face, because AFAIK there is no database of citizenship faces.

It is way more likely to be run against for instance criminal arrest photo databases.
There may be other segments they can take from like military and DMV, but they can't say that because they don't have a photo match that people aren't citizens.
It can only in a very limited percentage of cases confirm citizenship, and most of those will be people who have papers like a drivers license on them already.

This is probably part of the ongoing scare campaign, and serves very little practical purpose.

[–] lividweasel@lemmy.world 120 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The “facial recognition” might just do this:

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yup Caucasian features color good. The rest of ya'll are fucked.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

TSA has been scanning people's faces at security checkpoints for several years now. I've been opting out every time because I figured building a facial recognition database was the end goal.

they can't say that because they don't have a photo match that people aren't citizens.

Sure, sure, until they start doing it and no one stops them.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Opting out how? They have automatically-assembled video footage of you from the moment you stepped out of the vehicle you took to the airport up until the moment you walked off the jetway onto your flight.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Oh, that's true, but I'm talking about the direct face scan they do at the security line, which you have the right to opt out of.

There's still a big difference between security camera shots at a distance with random lighting and a specifically designed face scanning camera pointed directly at your face from two feet away with good lighting.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

I wish I shared your optimism, but I’ve seen what cameras are capable of seeing from literal miles away, if enough money is spent. I guess it comes down to weather or not any of the uncountable trillions of dollars the pentagon won’t let you audit have been spent on cameras specifically meant to surreptitiously capture your face from across the room when you “opt out”.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Opt Out" is basically just a "Pweeese don't scan my face 🥺", it doesn't have legal weight, I mean this admin doesn't really follow rules anymore.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago

No, in this case it literally means you don't stand in front of the face scanner and have your face scanned. I'm talking about going through the airport security line, where they have the face scanner device.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh I didn't think of airports. Thanks for pointing that out.

until they start doing it and no one stops them.

They'll do whatever the fuck they want, nobody is really stopping them.
Yes there are attempts and local heroes that do, but from an official side very little is being done.
And any official that complains about it, immediately becomes a target for the administration.
This fear campaign is far from only against immigrants, it is also to pacify Americans.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

DMV, court house, tax offices, post offices, Ring...

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

All of Facebook and Twitter and Youtube via Palantir?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Apart from DMV that I already mentioned, they don't have pictures of your face.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago

Dude it doesn't matter if it's legitimate or not, it will just be used as a cudgel against "undesirables" including political opponents.

[–] diablexical@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

What about the face scans through TSA and customs? I assumed those were going into every 3 letter agencies databases.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

It's very likely that they're using a facial recognition database made up of photos from immigration. People on visas, people who've been previously deported, etc.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

AFAIK there is no database of citizenship faces

Well I mean, I do have a Certificate of Citizenship from N-600 that has a photo of me on it. USCIS probably has it in their system.

But that photo was when I was like 13 or something, idk how they would even match that face. I have a photo ID (not "Real ID" compliant tho) that does have a recent photo, so do they looked that up? Do they even have access to DMV records?

Or is it gonna be:

?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Better check your papers are still legit, they have no problems throwing people out even on a minor technicality.
Or even better find somewhere else that isn't as much driven by hatred and sociopathy.

Too late, my entire family is in the US, we have strong ties here.

My paternal grandfather, 3 aunts, cousins, friends of my mother, the entire 关系 (Guanxi) relationship network, its all here. PRC is just hopeless which is why we left in the first place. We have no relatives in Canada or Europe or Australia, so this is why we are all here. I no longer have PRC Citizenship either way since they automatically revoked it after gaining US citizenship, on top of that I criticized the CCP too much, the bridge is already burned. Literally all my family assets are in the US...

"Just move lol" is not a realistic solution for most people. I mean, its almost impossible to find a democratic country that will accept us.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

100% This. This is entirely bullshit. This is likely illegal.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

You can't do a fascism!! That's illegal!

[–] muffedtrims@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

*Palantir enters the chat

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Get some AI to cross reference real name social media like Facebook with genealogy apps like Ancestry and you could make a citizenship facial scan app. There would be a lot of false positives, but as long as it's non-white people, this administration doesn't care.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't know how legal it is for govt usage, but people have been uploading photos to Meta for more than a decade at this point, directly associating their image with their identity.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 2 days ago

YouTube, Twitter, Insta...

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Even if there was, facial recognition isn't that good. A photo taken with a phone is just going to give you some level of confidence.

Its just an excuse, especially cause we know most facial recognition systems are racist to begin with.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

All the national intelligence agencies have a database with an entry for every person they can gain any information about. So yeah, a photo and citizenship status are in a govt database for sure.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't the NSA have exabytes (at a minimum) of data scrapped from the internet?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So we're not all that removed from a database of citizens and their faces. The work of actually collecting that information is already done, it's just a matter of organizing it. And there are already private contractors who specialize in just that kind of data organization.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 days ago

Snowden already showed us the database exists over a decade ago.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

how is everyone forgetting face scanning phone unlocks?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

taking your AI face scan for meta logins, and other various websites services.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago

yep those too but how does this preclude my point?

we’ve been giving them our face and name for years