Futurology

1813 readers

57 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Research shows people rate AI-generated content as better than human content, until they find out it's AI-generated. (www.cambridge.org)

submitted 1 year ago by Lugh to c/futurology

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AI is better but it's made by cheating. No good model was trained only on content that was public domain or properly licensed for use, so the images it produces are effectively a blend of traced artworks and never an original work.

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good thing artists never look at other peoples art.

[–] SchizoDenji@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Going to an art gallery is literally plagiarism!

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Humans, unlike computers, are incapable of completely recreating entire complex images from memory. Stable diffusion can, without even needing to be explicitly prompted to do so.

[–] SchizoDenji@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

completely recreating entire complex images from memory. Stable diffusion can, without even needing to be explicitly prompted to do so.

Learn how stable diffusion works then.

For starters, it can't recreate a piece of art 1 to 1 even if you go img to img.