It would fall down eventually and may hit some city or populated area, there is a option to shoot it to the moon but that's super expensive and needs lots of engineering.
[–]CanadaPlus1 points1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
(1 children)
Depends how far they boost it up. Once it's in MEO instead of LEO decay is less of a problem, and there would be ample time to achieve further boosts. For example the GPS satellites will take millenia to move considerably closer to earth.
The article actually mentions the idea, but apparently it's bound to physically fall apart after a while, and it's a big thing that could make a lot of debris. I guess you could put it in a net, but I'm not sure how cool a bundle of scrap that used to be the ISS is. The smart folks at NASA seem sure there's no point.
It would fall down eventually and may hit some city or populated area, there is a option to shoot it to the moon but that's super expensive and needs lots of engineering.
Depends how far they boost it up. Once it's in MEO instead of LEO decay is less of a problem, and there would be ample time to achieve further boosts. For example the GPS satellites will take millenia to move considerably closer to earth.
The article actually mentions the idea, but apparently it's bound to physically fall apart after a while, and it's a big thing that could make a lot of debris. I guess you could put it in a net, but I'm not sure how cool a bundle of scrap that used to be the ISS is. The smart folks at NASA seem sure there's no point.
Yeah the ISS gets hit by space debris form time to time and they need to do very frequent maintenance to not let it fall apart