this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
48 points (96.2% liked)

Futurology

2420 readers
240 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The title is misleading. Calling it a robot is being very generous. It's basically a propeller with magnets attached such that, if you stick it inside an externally generated magnetic field, it can fly. It's completely passive and does not have any onboard sensors.

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

Sounds like a paper airplane would make a better "battery-free, flying robot" than this thing, all you need is an arm to throw it

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Robot comes from the word roboto, that is work, no? If it can do autonomous work, it is a robot.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, so calling this a robot would be incorrect.

[–] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would be more of a robot part with the rest of the robot being the magnet

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Technically, maybe. Pretty limited applications, I think, but very cool.