this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
9 points (80.0% liked)

Futurology

2422 readers
167 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

No it didn't. It was not a conventional peer review process, it was an aesthetic review of if it looked adequate, not if the content was, and only barely passed… at an ai conference workshop… by people who knew it was an ai produced paper. this is shameful work.