this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
164 points (98.8% liked)

Futurology

2116 readers
99 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Why does cost even mean anything when talking about keeping our planet livable?

Do both.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 5 points 5 days ago

Because talking about carbon capture let's emitting companies not do anything to reduce emissions and tell themselves and the public "ah, we're just gonna do carbon capture in the future". It's the same with hydrogen btw., there won't be enough of it for our current use of fossils, we know it, but we still tell ourselves "ah, we'll just switch to green H2 as soon as it's available" instead of working to reduce emissions and implement new processes.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Renewable energy being the cheapest energy really, really helps

Carbon capture being expensive is unfortunate. It would be nice if we could cheaply use fossil fuels and keep the carbon out of the biosphere, but we can't, so we should just use renewable energy, and big countries can also use nuclear until we run out of fissile material

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

use fossil fuels and keep the carbon out of the biosphere

Put big balloons on the exhausts.

use nuclear

Yeah nuclear would be really great too for the time being.