this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
50 points (93.1% liked)

Futurology

1852 readers
87 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uservoid1@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (7 children)

the solar paint contains no rare earth elements or silicon. The material is made from non-toxic, readily available raw materials and is recyclable. It is also significantly cheaper to produce than conventional solar modules.

Sounds a bit too good to be true.

it is too soon to know if the solar paint will make it to production

If it is so good, why? My guess it's still in the vague concept stage and not even near actual testing with a moving car.

[–] BatrickPateman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Article says it was tested for 12 month and provided 60% of the energy needed for the commute each day.

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Without doing the math, that means they've broken several barriers in solar panel development, and this paint is more efficient than regular solar panels. If true, these guys aren't a car company any more, they are a solar company.

[–] Lugh 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Without doing the math, that means they’ve broken several barriers in solar panel development,

I'm borrowing this from elsewhere, but someone has done the math and says it works out.

The typical daily driven distance is only around 50 km or 30 miles, EV consumption is around 4 mpkWh so that's sound 7.5 kWh to recover in LA it's 9 hours average sunshine per day. So we need to collect solar energy at a rate of 830 W.

At 25% it's 3.4 kW solar radiation.

Solar intensity in LA is only around 300 W/m2

So you need 11 m2 coverage.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)