this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
50 points (93.1% liked)

Futurology

1852 readers
86 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gazter@aussie.zone 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Without doing the math, that means they've broken several barriers in solar panel development, and this paint is more efficient than regular solar panels. If true, these guys aren't a car company any more, they are a solar company.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And the absolutely last thing we should be painting with this stuff is a vehicle that will likely spend much of its time inside a garage. If this breakthrough technology truly exists we should be painting all kinds of other things with it instead including currently existing solar panels apparently.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Gotta start somewhere and it's probably really hard to pitch expensive paint as a solution. If cars with solar paint take off, the prices come down substantially....and if it goes on a fancy car, it's got the cool factor now

[–] Lugh 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Without doing the math, that means they’ve broken several barriers in solar panel development,

I'm borrowing this from elsewhere, but someone has done the math and says it works out.

The typical daily driven distance is only around 50 km or 30 miles, EV consumption is around 4 mpkWh so that's sound 7.5 kWh to recover in LA it's 9 hours average sunshine per day. So we need to collect solar energy at a rate of 830 W.

At 25% it's 3.4 kW solar radiation.

Solar intensity in LA is only around 300 W/m2

So you need 11 m2 coverage.