Futurology

3352 readers

60 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 10 months ago by Espiritdescali to c/futurology

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Plants are many other of magnitude better than this.
Consider this result they got (and how expensive it must be) :

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, Rock Stored Carbon is less impactful compared to say Land Stored Carbon (Biomass burial, Paulownia, Bamboo)

Good thing there are people working on all different Carbon Capture methods.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

huh ? Jup Rock ? ... is this chalk ?
(we do know most carbon on Earth is stored in rocks ... maybe we could call them carbonate rocks ?)

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago

See edit