this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
28 points (86.8% liked)
Futurology
1852 readers
87 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Plants are many other of magnitude better than this.
Consider this result they got (and how expensive it must be) :
from :
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08080-x
Yes, Rock Stored Carbon is less impactful compared to say Land Stored Carbon (Biomass burial, Paulownia, Bamboo)
Good thing there are people working on all different Carbon Capture methods.
huh ? Jup Rock ? ... is this chalk ?
(we do know most carbon on Earth is stored in rocks ... maybe we could call them carbonate rocks ?)
See edit