this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
629 points (97.0% liked)

News

23406 readers
3282 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 95 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I do not blame any woman or queer person arming themselves in the U.S. right now. But I think that you should think of it as personal protection rather than preparation for something larger.

Be aware of this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disarmament_of_the_German_Jews

The Jews of Germany constituted less than 1 percent of the country's population. It is preposterous to argue that the possession of firearms would have enabled them to mount resistance against a systematic program of persecution implemented by a modern bureaucracy, enforced by a well-armed police state, and either supported or tolerated by the majority of the German population. Mr. Carson's suggestion that ordinary Germans, had they had guns, would have risked their lives in armed resistance against the regime simply does not comport with the regrettable historical reality of a regime that was quite popular at home. Inside Germany, only the army possessed the physical force necessary for defying or overthrowing the Nazis, but the generals had thrown in their lot with Hitler early on.

Obviously, women and queer people are a lot more than 1% of the population, but you can't count on every queer person being on the right side and you certainly can't count on every woman to be on the right side.

[–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I think we agree that it is important to consider parallels in history, but the US is not 1930s Germany.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The U.S. is almost exactly like 1930s Germany in 1932. It's not 1933 yet.

[–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Germany is roughly 138,000 square miles in size, while the USA is approximately 4,000,000 square miles.

The population of Germany in the 1930's was roughly 60,000,000, the population of the US today, closer to 400,000,000.

The US does not share an international border with 10 different countries.

That's just for starters. So while I agree there are parallels, there are a lot more differences that you're not accounting for.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I don't think you're stupid and I think you're able to read context, so why you're pretending I wasn't talking about the political atmosphere and playing this "well actually" game, I don't know.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (37 children)

The second amendment was not made for personal protection

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It was also opposed by George Washington on the argument that "A bunch of farmers with guns will never defeat a trained army." He basically did exactly that, but it took the support of one of the world's largest super powers at the time in order to do it - France.

Not to say don't arm yourself. I plan on doing exactly that myself. But don't expect to be overthrowing the dictatorship to come. There are no resistance groups being armed by the EU here.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

There are no resistance groups being armed by the EU here.

Not yet.

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'd like it if indigenous Amazonians had better tools than bows to defend against loggers, ranchers, miners and various land grabbers. And a few SAMs to take care of those chemical airborne attacks.

[–] 5in1k@lemm.ee 6 points 20 hours ago

I’m going to make myself harder to black bag.

[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Washington was talking about the militias that were present in the early parts of the war that were under trained and undisciplined. The red coats took them easily and they fled often so the continental congress started the continental army lead by Washington, which was a trained and disciplined army in the style of European standing armies, which was able to take on and even defeat the British occasionally.

After the war the ruling elite still had this idealized vision of citizen militias protecting the liberty of white man and saw it as a less tyrannical, and cheaper model then the European professional standing army and made the second amendment to encourage it. Washington was saying that that system failed and will never work and that we should have a trained army ready to take on European powers if they come back.

Now we have the worst of both worlds, a massive army that gobbles up tax dollars and a bunch of untrained citizens with guns who barely understand what a militia is much less can protect the liberty of the nation.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, pretty much what I was getting at. We live in a country where everybody believes themselves to be the hero in their own Rambo style action movie.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

"Just another American who saw too many movies as a child? Another orphan of a bankrupt culture who thinks he's John Wayne? Rambo? Marshal Dillon?"

Edit: I can't be the only person who's seen Die Hard.

You mean the best Christmas movie?

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Getting another superpower to arm Americans is like putting a hat on a hat

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

that was before tanks and instant communication. the army would have been less organized and maybe you could have a chance against the government, especially as a militia. today you don't.

you do have a chance against a bunch of fuckwads who threaten you because the party they voted for won and the think they can rape freely now. just not the government.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The last three wars have been pretty recent, and haven’t not gone well against a foe no where near or equal. Not so much as a pyric victory, but an eventual unwillingness to keep wasting time and money and lives, and we just left. What do you call it when you just leave a war failing all your objectives and handing over territory to the enemy?

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

what are you talking about? control over your own land is nothing like invading a remote country halfway around the world.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Yes, like its two completely different things

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

in what way is the US even remotely comparable to Afghanistan?

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

We have psychos trying to implement a theocratic government and oppressing women and minorities like Afghanistan

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

lol... yeah but i meant in terms of using guns to oppose the government

load more comments (35 replies)