this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
35 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

1813 readers
56 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lugh 8 points 5 days ago (6 children)

A lot of these open sourced AIs have been released that way to undercut competitors. Many people still think AI will consolidate into the hands only the biggest of Big Tech players, but it doesn't seem to be happening yet.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (5 children)

It will boil down to open source tooling and corporate data sets. This is the same pattern as anything else, but these people never learn their lessons. The fad will fade, free tools will be used by most, but corporate interests will pay the bigger players for their models and datasets.

[–] Philosofuel 2 points 5 days ago (4 children)

So do you think a centralisation of AI "power" will lie in who has the most/best data? Was just reading Nexus, and Yuval Harari suggests that a centralisation of power is due to the most resources (data centers) and the data itself. Wondering what your take is, or if I'm not getting it.

[–] Lugh 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The problem for all the investor funded AIs, is that data centers are huge costs. They're burning through billions of dollars every month. That makes sense if one of two of them emerge as dominant players who own most of the market share for future AI businesses.

If they all keep under-cutting each other by using open-source. It's more likely companies like OpenAI will crash and burn first.

[–] Philosofuel 4 points 5 days ago

It really does feel like a trillion dollar investor game of chicken, where some investors or company has to admit defeat at some point.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)