Futurology

1823 readers

56 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

118

AI PCs flood the market. Their makers hope someone wants them; Despite 49% surge in shipments, buyers seem unconvinced. (www.theregister.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by Lugh to c/futurology

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not talking about stable diffusion or anything like that.

I meant whatever Twitter, or any similar chatbots, or AI assistant features of apps should be run on server-side, not put a load on customers' devices.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, no, I get the spirit of the thing. I'm just saying that... well, for one that it wouldn't be a bad idea if it worked, it just doesn't at the moment. But more importantly that regulations don't work like that. You can't just make rules that go "hey you guys specifically have to run this software on a server specifically". You can already run assistants locally using a whole bunch of downloadable models, it'd be a huge overreach to tell people and companies that they CAN make the software and run it, but only remotely. That's just... not how rules and regulations are put together.