this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
440 points (97.6% liked)

Linux

48356 readers
565 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChiefSinner@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Uhh ~~sir~~ Linus, this is a ~~Wendy's~~ Linux kernel.

.

Why force your political beliefs on something that has nothing to do with?

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not sure if being against Russian aggression can be called a "political belief" as nearly all Finns pretty much agree on it.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@vga @ChiefSinner That it was "aggression" in and of itself is a political belief.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What else would you call it? Even if you buy one of the many bullshit rationalizations Russia has offered, invading a sovereign neighbor is absolutely aggression, if words still mean things.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@Tinidril How about self defense, same thing we would have called the invasion of Cuba if the Russians hadn't backed down.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So, a US invasion of Cuba wouldn't be aggressive? I guess words really don't mean anything then. That's some really pathetic whataboutism BTW.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@Tinidril It's realistic is what it is. It's not trying to paint Putin as some evil Hitler clone. It's what happens when you don't have a vested interest in the military industrial complex and aren't a shill for someone who does.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The hundreds of thousands dead so-far will be glad to know that Putin is just being misunderstood and is actually a pretty nice guy. Who the fuck said anything about Hitler?

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@Tinidril If it were not for our input I kind of doubt that would be the case.

You know we are at a precipice, we have the technology now to really make this world a nice place, or we can fight over what are mostly obsolete resources and turn it into a hellscape. I would prefer the former but obviously you and a lot of others prefer the latter.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm against Russia invading Ukraine to commit genocide and steal scarce resources so, therefore, I must be in favor of killing people and stealing resources. Yeah, that tracks. Try harder.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@Tinidril I would be against that too but that is not the reason they invaded the Ukraine. I know someone who was born in Kiev, then lived in Moscow Russia, then moved to the United States, so he identifies with both sides of the conflict and just wants to see it end, but that's not happen as long as we continue to turn it into a proxy war with Russia.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Putin was so concerned about NATO expanding right to Russia's doorstep that he did an invasion that immediately led to NATO expanding right to Russia's doorstep. Even Putin stopped trying to sell that bullshit months ago, probably because it makes him look like a complete idiot.

If the US abandons Ukraine, you think that's the end of the conflict? Completing an invasion is the easy part. It's occupation that's the hard part. That's when the real brutality begins, and Russia doesn't have nearly enough occupiers to do it properly. There will be at least a decade of even more horrific bloodshed, probably ending in a Russian withdrawal.

Your friend's heart might be in the right place, but they don't know how warfare works.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@Tinidril He was backed into a corner and so he fought, he gave plenty of indications of what would happen, we ignored them, he followed through with exactly what he said he would do. If we'd followed through with what we said we would do and not advanced NATO past East Germany, then all Raytheon and company wouldn't be racking in the dollars killing people now.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Believe what you want dude but, like I said, even Putin dropped that nonsense.