this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
170 points (93.8% liked)

Futurology

1801 readers
56 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The physics of electrical conduction mean that you can't cram thousands of watts of power down any given wire without issue. This is why appliance cords are thicker than phone charging cords.

Pushing enough electrons to drive a car a thousand km through a wire in under 10 minutes is going to take a THICCC cable.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's not completely accurate. The limiting factor is the resistive heating of the cable, relative to the cable's ability to shed that heat. If heat can't leave the cable faster than it is being added, it will eventually melt or burn through the insulation.

If you wrap the cable strands around a cooling tube, you can use water, oil, or a refrigerant to carry away the heat and push a lot more power through a similar sized cable.

Large underground transmission lines have used such methods.

It may be that the charging station will need to actively cool its cables , and the vehicle's air conditioning system might need a second evaporator coil to actively cool the battery and charging circuitry. But it's certainly possible to deliver that amount of power in that short a time frame, without having to resort to "THICCC" cables.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A cable with integrated cooling pipes would be pretty THICC

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago

Probably about as THICC as the fuel hose at a gas pump.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The cables that power trams and electric buses aren't that thick.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Not to mention some serious electronics...