this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

1801 readers
46 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KindleGem678 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That’s 5 / minute (as another commenter pointed out) or 1 every 12 seconds. If a human bricklayer worked that slow, my guess is they’d be fired

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

That's true, but only because the human bricklayer has to be paid for their work. As long as the robot's output outweighs its initial cost and recurring maintenance, it's likely still profitable even if it could only lay 100 bricks an hour. Especially if multiple robots can work in tandem.

[–] fuzzyspudkiss@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Not if they worked 24/7 and didn't ask for health benefits or retirement.