Futurology

1807 readers

66 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Even with poorly labeled training data, new research shows AI outperforming Radiologists in diagnosing rarely encountered conditions. (www.openicpsr.org)

submitted 5 months ago by Lugh to c/futurology

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They should provide that instantly if the patient wants it (once the scan is developed). Ad whatever disclaimers and waivers you want, but I wouldn't mind an instant answer.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Or, just have it as part of the xrqy software.

Analysis determines this could be X, here's a link to Kore info on this rate condition. Please confirm diagnosis and report.

We don't need AI to make a diagnosis. Its a tool. The health professional can be trained in its use, just like they do for any other test.

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you tell a profesional that the answer is "B", while the professional had "A" in mind, you will have to convince them on why "B" is the correct answer, or they will ignore your suggestion. I think a good LLM model should be able to tell which features it valued most in it's reasoning. It would make it much easier to get used to as a tool that way.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago

I agree, while they are sceotical. However research data over time should show sensitivity and specificity, just like any other test.