this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
143 points (98.6% liked)

Futurology

1808 readers
49 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's not all that surprising but it is still sad

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

not to me. I would like us to work on robotics to build stuff that could be used when we send people out again or mining and such. would love to have them work on a lunar space elevator to work out the tech.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I have to suspect a lunar orbiter would be more practical for lunar base building and fueling further missions than a lunar space elevator, wouldn't you need angular momentum from rotation to keep it rigid?

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

its not really about being a better option as much as to see how it would be and work on the technolgy involved in making it happen. with the lower gravity and lack of atmosphere it should theoretically be a best case scenario and can be done without any super materials.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A Martian space elevator can be built with high tensile steel, and will be shorter than one on the moon. I like space elevators, but they work better on smaller bodies with higher rotation, i.e., low gravity and lower stationary orbits.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

yeah but the moon is close and makes a faster easier testbed. I would actually like to have it followed up by a martian one.