this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
265 points (98.9% liked)

Futurology

1812 readers
242 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 37 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I mean, the Japanese police has been doing this for decades with paintball guns. Definitely better than high speed chases.

[–] realbadat@programming.dev 41 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh 100% it's better than high speed chases.

And given the history of basically every police force throughout the United States, guaranteed to be misused and abused as well.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, police are already abusing GPS trackers. The thing is that banning technology isn't going to fix that, it's a government that will hold police accountable for their crimes.

[–] realbadat@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago

I don't believe anyone said anything about banning anything.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean... their comment was specifically NOT about the normal intended use.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That's a policy problem, not a technology problem. Cops are abusing every tool they're given because they can get away with it, not because of the tool. If you sent them on patrol unarmed and on foot they'd still be going around beating up people with the current oversight regime.

[–] realbadat@programming.dev 9 points 7 months ago

That's the reaction here though.

Not the technology, the lack of oversight. I didn't see any mention of an oversight board or review panel, repercussions for abuse, etc.

Which with any technology, and the clear history of exactly the issues you've noted, is an absolute requirement imo.

Great tech and approach. Guaranteed to be used correctly in some cases, and massively abused in others. Without policy revisions to address those abuses, it's a potentially very frightening technology in police hands.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

"... because they can get away with it."

Sounds like it doesn't matter what tech we give them so long as they can get away with it.