this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
50 points (90.3% liked)

Futurology

3285 readers
142 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Why? Reduced headcount = reduced stress on resources. The key is acknowledging specifically where the population has capped, and meeting the needs of those where it hasn't. Also increasing the availability of immigration to smooth these spikes and transitions.

(I am not advocating eugenics or classical overpopulation myths. Only recognizing that if we were in a situation where population was going to say, double, we would have different concerns in 100 years.)

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nah it's a joke of nuclear war happening, causing the massive drop in population growth

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They said what happens NEXT so in the headline, the population caps, THEN the NEXT happens.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I misunderstood "next" as in next from now, instead of next after the peak