Futurology Today

444 readers
8 users here now

This is a sibling community to r/futurology on Reddit, set up and moderated by the same people.

If you would like to make a contribution to our server costs, however small, you can donate here.
Ko-Fi (Donate)

July 2024: We are 40% of the way there. Thank you to @Philosofuel & @threelonmusketeers for contributing.

TAKE CARE NOT TO FORGET YOUR PASSWORD UNTIL YOU ADD A RECOVERY EMAIL TO YOUR ACCOUNT DETAILS.

Uptime

Uptime

OUR RULES

  1. Be respectful to others - this includes no hostility, racism, sexism, bigotry, etc.

  2. Submissions must be future focused.

  3. No memes, reaction gifs or similarly low effort content.

  4. No spamming - this includes polls and surveys. This also includes promoting any content in which you have any kind of financial or non-financial stake.

  5. Bots require moderator permission to operate

  6. Comments must be on topic, contribute to the discussion and be of sufficient length. Comments that dismiss well-established science without compelling evidence are a distraction to discussion of futurology and may be removed.

Do you like the old Reddit interface? You can browse us that way if you like. https://old.futurology.today/

founded 1 year ago
ADMINS
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
13
On Bluesky and enshittification (fediversereport.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by Lugh to c/futurology
89
 
 

Boston Dynamics latest demo of its humanoid robot Atlas shows the day when robots can do most unskilled and semi-skilled work is getting closer. At the current rate of development that may be as soon as 2030.

Many people's ideas of the future are shaped by dystopian narratives from sci-fi. For storytelling purposes they always dramatize things to be the worst possible. But they are a poor way of predicting the future.

UBTECH, a Chinese manufacturer's $16,000 humanoid robot is a better indicator of where things are going. The sci-fi dystopian view of the future is that mega-corps will own and control the robots and 99% of humanity will be reduced to serfdom.

All the indications are that things are going in the opposite direction. The more likely scenario is that people will be able to purchase several humanoid robots for the price of an average car. It's not inconceivable that average people will be able to afford robots to grow their own food (if they have some land), maintain their houses, and do additional work for them.

Meta's Open Source Robotics AI

90
91
92
93
94
95
 
 

Here's a video of the latest version of the humanoid robot Atlas.

Boston Dynamics has always been a leader in robotics, but there are many others not far behind it. Not only will robots like Atlas continue to improve, thanks to Chinese manufacturing they will get cheaper. UBTECH's version of Atlas retails for $16,000. Some will quibble it's not as good, but it soon will be. Not only that but in a few years' time, many manufacturer's robots will be more powerful than Atlas is today. Some Chinese versions will be even cheaper than UBTECH's.

At some point, robots like these will be selling in their thousands, and then millions to do unskilled and semi-skilled work that now employs humans, the only question is how soon. At $16,000, and considering they can work 24/7, they will cost a small fraction to employ, versus even minimum wage jobs.

96
97
98
99
1
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by RewindAgain to c/futurology_youtube
 
 

Here's an AI summary of the video

Small modular reactors (SMRs) aim to make nuclear power faster and cheaper, but they face significant cost overruns and delays, raising doubts about their viability.

Highlights

๐Ÿ“ˆ Growing Interest: Over 25 countries are investing in SMRs due to renewable energy challenges.

๐Ÿšข Modular Design: SMRs can be produced in factories and transported, similar to modular furniture.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Cost Issues: Initial estimates for SMR projects often triple or quadruple, making them expensive.

โณ Delayed Timelines: Projects typically take three times longer to complete than planned.

๐ŸŒ Limited Operations: Only three SMRs are operational globally, indicating slow progress.

๐Ÿ” Underestimating Costs: Companies may downplay costs to attract investors, complicating financial forecasting.

โš ๏ธ Need for Realism: Acknowledging these challenges is crucial for the future of nuclear power.

Key Insights

๐ŸŒŽ Global Momentum: Many countries are recognizing the need for SMRs due to energy demands and climate goals, but investment alone doesnโ€™t guarantee success.

๐Ÿญ Production Challenges: While SMRs promise factory production, the reality of logistics and assembly can complicate this efficiency.

๐Ÿ“Š Economic Viability: High costs undermine the argument for SMRs as a cheaper alternative, raising concerns about their competitiveness against renewables.

๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ Project Management: The significant delays in SMR projects highlight the need for better project management and realistic timelines in nuclear development.

๐Ÿ”„ Innovation Stagnation: The lack of recent technological advancements in nuclear energy contributes to ongoing reliability and cost issues for SMRs.

๐Ÿ“ˆ Investor Hesitance: The pattern of underestimating costs may deter potential investors, complicating funding for future projects.

๐Ÿ” Critical Perspective: Supporting nuclear energy requires an honest assessment of its challenges, ensuring informed decisions in energy policy.

100
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ