sabreW4K3

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 10 points 3 days ago

even Mercedes and Toyota left a huge deal in the early days.

What does this mean please?

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 3 points 4 days ago

The developer also posted here IIRC, so that's a W.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/48438854

The restrictions also mean that disabled people can’t get a bus for free after 11 pm, because we don’t have social lives or jobs...

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 21 points 4 days ago

This is pretty fucking stupid. If OEMs are struggling with monthly releases, punish them, not general users. Android has made massive strides to make releases by OEMS quick and simple.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I knew of all the a versions having issues, but not the flagships

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 4 points 4 days ago

The speakers are annoying AF. I don't want to hear fake sounds from a car. In fact part of why I love EVs is because they're not loud and obnoxious like ICE cars.

The animations though, I like. Though you better be able to disable them.

 

Yes, attacking a flotilla of civilian ships trying to deliver humanitarian aid is considered a war crime under international humanitarian law. This is a specific application of the principles mentioned previously, particularly the principle of distinction. Here's why:

  • Civilian Status: The ships and the people on board are, by definition, civilians and civilian objects. They are not taking part in hostilities. Their purpose is peaceful and humanitarian.
  • Protection of Humanitarian Aid: International law, particularly the Geneva Conventions and their protocols, places a high degree of protection on humanitarian relief operations. Parties to a conflict have an obligation to allow and facilitate the rapid and unimpeded passage of humanitarian aid for civilians in need. Obstructing or attacking such aid can be a war crime.
  • Loss of Protection: A civilian ship would only lose its protected status if it was being used to commit "acts harmful to the enemy," for example, if it were secretly being used for military purposes or was carrying weapons. If the sole purpose is to deliver aid, the protection remains.

In summary, the targeting of a humanitarian flotilla, its crew, or its passengers is a serious violation of the laws of armed conflict, which protect both civilians and the critical infrastructure and operations designed to help them.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 1 points 5 days ago

There's some good indies like Feeld still out there.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 0 points 6 days ago

Thought all of them did

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's better than Tinder around, but ultimately, no matter what app you install, know it's Pay To Win. Good luck!

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 2 points 1 week ago

Crazy statement

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nope, it's just an option in the main settings.

Settings -> Security & Privacy -> Advanced Protection

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If you disable advanced protection, you can bypass their check

view more: next ›