valek879

Peanits

Yes, we currently have something similar although it's less comprehensive. That's what the article is about.

Your logic seems sound.

Keep an eye on the Seattle election. If the progressive wins the race there will be a lot of gearing up for a huge influx of people. The people are expected either way but the progressive want to do something to house them and the conservatives want it all to be a surprise.

My family is interested in going international however.

And the Dark Side.

Power Ranger

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle

It's the same mindset and response as is directed at regressive states. Now I'm not saying I don't agree with the sentiment, but even places like Florida and Texas have literally millions of people that continue to try to do their part too.

Still no updoot for the bad take but like I get it.

Okay so hear me out, public, neighborhood car parks but also a network of car free streets.

Like my neighborhood is surrounded by arterials, what if you had a car park that was free like within 5 blocks. Is it a waste of space that could be used for housing? Yes. But it also moves cars to the periphery and opens up like 25 blocks to be car free neighborhood streets where people can walk, children can play and we have less noise pollution and can easily build community.

We can designate areas of on street parking for disabled people and allow services into the neighborhood but we could limit the entrances and have more clutter and places to sit and vibe instead of having to maintain vigilance.

I heard about Notebook LM recently. I couldn't tell you what it's trained on but I'm order to use the LLM you need to provide it source material.

So say you're writing something for school. You can gather 50+ papers on the subject you're trying to write about, upload them, then ask the LLM about what you uploaded. Sounds like turning research from a search for info to an interview with an "expert."

Again I can't speak to how it was trained in the background but this seems genuinely useful.

I'd like to wait and see what happens at the trial before declaring him innocent or guilty. Just like any conspiracy theory in the past there are plenty of reasons to believe he is innocent. It does seem that he is probably the person but what I've seen and read hasn't convinced me beyond a shadow.

The liars in charge of our government keep saying this is the guy, and we should kill him. I find that super suss.

It's not weird that I'm waiting for more info before forming an opinion.

It is much more weird that you're taking the word of police at face value. If you want to kill him so badly, prove it.

Fortunately this is not how criminal courts work. Or at least not how they're supposed to. You don't have to prove your innocence, they have to prove that you are guilty.

If you think he put holes in that CEO, prove it.

Things have felt stable but I just looked at USD vs EUR last night and were back down to pandemic dollar strength. The fall is precipitous.