let's play a fun game where we read a "breaking news" story about a scientific "discovery" and count the reasons to be skeptical about it
by Patty Wellborn, University of British Columbia
...
Dr. Mir Faizal, Adjunct Professor with UBC Okanagan's Irving K. Barber Faculty of Science
right off the bat - you have a conflict of interest where the person writing this is from the same university as the lead author.
this article is stylized to read like "news" but it's probably more accurate to treat it like you would a press release.
and in fact, this same text is on UBC's website where it explicitly says "Content type: Media Release"
Patty Wellborn's author page there seems to indicate that writing this kind of press release is a major part of her job
and his international colleagues, Drs. Lawrence M. Krauss
huh...that name sounds familiar...let me go check his wikipedia page and oh look there's a Controversies section with "Relationship with Jeffrey Epstein" and "Allegations of sexual misconduct" subsections.
Their findings, published in the Journal of Holography Applications in Physics
that journal is published by Damghan University in Iran
there's a ton of xenophobia and Islamophobia that gets turned up to 11 when people in the English-speaking world start discussing Iran, so I don't want to dismiss this journal out-of-hand...but their school of physics has 2 full professors?
if I was going to find out "oh Damghan is actually well-regarded for physics research" or something that's not what I'd expect to see
but anyway, let's look at the paper itself
except, hold on, it's not a paper, it's a letter:
Document Type : Letter
that's an important difference:
Letters: This is a very ambiguous category, primarily defined by being short, often <1000 words. They may be used to report a single piece of information, often from part of a larger study, or may be used to respond to another paper. These may or may not go out for peer review - for example, I recently had a paper accepted where the decision was made entirely by the editor.
reading a bit further:
Received: June 6, 2025; Accepted: June 17, 2025
this is "proving" something fundamental about the nature of the universe...and the entire review process took 11 calendar days? (basically one work week, the 6th was a Friday and the 17th was a Tuesday)
-oxidoreductase