this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
40 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

40637 readers
294 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I mean, Ao3 has existed for years, and literotica for years longer, but okay, if someone wants something personalised. Vague concerns of plagiarism aside, it's interesting. The problem I see is that people will take it back to those sites and upload it as their own and not declare it as AI.

We already have AI generated music that has fooled some people. I think AI generated stories will be harder to track. And it's going to be divisive. One thing I'd like to see is someone prolific like Stephen King do it as an experiment. So King — or, more likely, a young intern working for him — prompts an AI to write a book in the style of Stephen King. And they prompt it to include certain things. Then, Stephen King himself actually writes the book, and the two are packaged together for the cost of the one book. You get the Stephen King version, and you get the AI version which has some ridiculous name. And it's going to tell the same story, but it's going to do it slightly differently. So you can read King's version — I think most readers would either read this one first, or this one only — and then, if you're up to it, you can read the AI version. This would do two things. One, it would (possibly) prove that AI cannot fully replace human writers. Two (and not mutually exclusive to the previous point), it would give you an alternate-reality version of the first story, and that could be interesting.

[–] spit_evil_olive_tips@beehaw.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This would do two things. One, it would (possibly) prove that AI cannot fully replace human writers. Two (and not mutually exclusive to the previous point), it would give you an alternate-reality version of the first story, and that could be interesting.

this is just "imagine if chatbots were actually useful" fan-fiction

who the hell would want to actually read both the actual King story and the LLM slop version?

at best you'd have LLM fanboys ask their chatbot to summarize the differences between the two, and stroke their neckbeards and say "hmm, isn't that interesting"

4 emdashes in that paragraph, btw. did you write those yourself?

[–] InevitableList@beehaw.org 2 points 4 days ago

A recent winner of the Akutagawa prize in Japan said she used chatbots to write around 5% of her novel so they're already proving useful.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Are you asking how to make em dashes? Hold dash on a phone, Shift+Option+Dash on a Mac, Alt+0151 on Windows.

Shit, you might be able to blame me for LLMs using em dashes. Been using them forever. Maybe even longer than you've been alive.

load more comments (3 replies)