root

joined 2 years ago
[–] root@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh this looks interesting, thank you. So you basically just backup the relevant parts of the file system and then use this to restore in case of an incident/ emergency? A little more hands on than just restoring from a Proxmox backup, but probably also more agnostic/ interoperable.

 

I have had Proxmox running nightly backups and saving them to my NAS for years now without any issues. I've been thinking that it would also be nice to have these copied over to my cloud storage (some smaller company, no available plugins).

I know Proxmox Backup Server exists, but not much more than that other than it can backup to popular cloud providers.

The cloud provider I have has a Linux client that will create a shared folder on the system. My thought was to mount the Proxmox VM backup location with CIFS, install my cloud client and then write a script to run as a cronjob that would copy files from the Proxmox VM to the cloud folder each night.

This feels a bit clunky so I just wanted to ask if anyone knew of a better solution.

[–] root@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Thanks! I was very early on the Reddit APIpocolypse exodus, haha.

[–] root@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Lmao. Well done.

[–] root@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Great interview; Love Lutris :)

[–] root@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, that's a good point. For me it's mostly family that is not very technical, so I'm not too concerned of them using a fork.

[–] root@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Poor security implementations that would become the weakest link in the security chain

[–] root@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Definitely. Capturing the messages isn't my concern though as much as interacting with non authentic clients

[–] root@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (12 children)

Yes of course. Signal can archive messages and they can be restored, you can screenshot messages and you can have them backed up as part of a policy like icloud backups.

My question is more about how do you know you're interacting with an authentic signal client, and not a bastardized one.

31
TM Signal (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by root@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
 

The scariest part of this recent news is that TM Signal seem(ed) to be interoperable. People using TM Signal could interact with actual Signal users. How are you to know whether or not your groups have people using bastardized versions of Signal? Are things like Session interoperable with Signal?

[–] root@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

This might feel bad, but honestly you're still killing it. I graduated at like 30 after grinding out years and years of CC. You have great prospects, just stay focused

[–] root@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why is Incogni bad?

[–] root@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I recently started playing with scenes too. Maybe I should go that route with more of my lights

[–] root@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
 

I currently have a lot of my light automations setup by first having an automation that turns the light on at a certain time, then another that turns the light off at another time. This works, and it has for years, but I'm imagining there must be blueprints or other methods to do this on/ off behavior in a single automation rather than having them in pairs (this is not scaling very well).

Anyone have suggestions? The image is a blueprint I have for turning lights on/ off based on a time window which is very handy, and I'm hoping there's something similar out there for my needs.

 

I realized I have some old hue bulbs laying around, and they're working well enough with my Zigbee controller (no bridge), but if I decide to scale up I definitely don't want to pay the Hue premium.

Anyone have a Zigbee bulb brand they recommend? I hear Third Reality is nice?

 

I previously hacked together an Ikea sensor which worked well for the price, but was not weatherproof, and my solution caused the temperatures to be very inaccurate.

I'm looking for something that can be used offline (connects to HA via WiFi, Zigbee, etc but does not need WAN access) and is plug and play. I see some solutions like this, but am not sure if they will work in an 'offline' mode. Anyone have any suggestions? Something with wind speed, etc would be awesome.

 

I am looking for a privacy respecting (and ideally E2EE supporting) email/ calendar/ contacts provider.

I had previously used ProtonMail up until a few months ago when the CEO started getting political (bummer).

I've since been using TutaMail, and while it's a bit rough on the UI/UX, I do appreciate that the team behind it seems very privacy focused. One problem here though, is that family that is also using this is ending up in spam folders when emailing others (I guess Tuta is more likely to be flagged as spam).

Does anyone have any suggestions for alternate providers?

 

I am looking for a simple to use VoIP provider that I mainly plan to use for 2FA (when a cell number is required). I know there are checks that sometimes prevent VoIP from being used but I figure it's worth a shot.

MySudo looks nice but they require Google play services to be installed, VoIP.ms looks nice too but I've had a hard time getting a hold of anyone there to help with activating my account.

Anyone have any recommendations?

 

I've used Graphene OS for years, but only recently started taking advantage of the profiles feature.

Currently the Owner profile that you log into on first boot is my main profile, and I have a secondary decoy profile that I can switch to. Is this the best way to do this, or should it be the other way around so that on first boot you go into the decoy, which also allows you to end the session of the main profile?

 

I have a SearXNG instance running locally, and I have a proxy entry for this (search.home). When I go to https://search.home/ in Firefox, it works as expected and brings me to SearXNG, however if I try adding this as my default search, it instead resolves to the IP and not the hostname, which fails because the IP does not have a cert on it and it tries to hit it with https (as would work with the hostname).

This works in Firefox mobile, and every other web browser I've tried on desktop, just not Firefox for some reason. I've tried various about:config changes but so far no luck. Anyone else have a workaround for this? It would be nice if Firefox showed you what it actually has saved for the url/hostname/IP of the search engine in the Search section of the Settings, but sadly it just has the name and shortcut listed.

 

I recently generated a self-signed cert to use with NGINX via it's GUI.

  1. Generate cert and key
  2. Upload these via the GUI
  3. Apply to each Proxy Host

Now when I visit my internal sites (eg, jellyfin.home) I get a warning (because this cert is not signed by a trusted CA) but the connection is https.

My question is, does this mean that my connection is fully encrypted from my client (eg my laptop) to my server hosting Jellyfin? I understand that when I go to jellyfin.home, my PiHole resolves this to NGINX, then NGINX completes the connection to the IP:port it has configured and uses the cert it has assigned to this proxy host, but the Jellyfin server itself does not have any certs installed on it.

10
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by root@lemmy.world to c/homelab@lemmy.ml
 

I recently setup SearXNG to take the place of Whoogle (since Google broke it by disabling JS free query results). I am following the same steps I've always done in adding a new default search engine.

Navigate to the address bar, right click "Add SearXNG" then go into settings and make it my default. After doing this, rather than using the local IP the instance is running at, Firefox uses https://localhost/search for some reason. I don't see a way to edit this in the settings section of Firefox. Anyone else experienced this?

Update: After updating the .env file with my IP address and bring docker down/ up, all is working as expected (able to use SearXNG via Caddy using the https:// address)

 

For years, I have been using Whoogle for my self-hosted searches. It's been great, but recently there were some upstream changes that seem to have broken it.

I'm guessing that SearXng will soon follow (based on the assumption that they too are using the JS free results Google used to provide).

Does anyone have any self-hosted search options that still work? I hear Kagi is good for paid/ non-self hosted options, but just curious what you all are using.

view more: next ›