ormr

joined 1 year ago
[–] ormr@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Wieso musst du die gleiche Anmerkung 3x im gleichen thread posten?

[–] ormr@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Okay, but you're misinformed and trying to prove a point that's just not related to the report linked in this thread. If you were interested in if this statistic is useful and what information is contained in it, you'd just translate some pages and read before making wild assumptions based on nothing but your ideology.

Yes, violence does not constitute the major part of felonies mentioned in the report. 37% are property damage and "propaganda offences" = using anti-constitutional symbols like swastikas, etc. A further 40% are insults, intimidation, coercion, incitement of violence, etc. And this has nothing to do with hate speech laws. It's not the state who's suing here but people who have been insulted, intimidated, etc. and it's of course very much their right to sue in this case.

[–] ormr@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Can recommend the book flash boys about the topic of dark pools, high frequency trading, etc. and how the setup, the parameters of this system enables fraud.

[–] ormr@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It seems like we also don't care what the damage is or else we would make at least some effort to secure our IT systems. Of course the robber should be blamed but those who leave their doors wide open are guilty too. If we care so much about the consequences of ransomware attacks, why do we not act and avoid shitty software that only compromises security and instead built more resilient systems?

[–] ormr@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Und er hat diesen gelöscht wegen "geil"?

[–] ormr@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Yes, I think this is what we're gonna see. Even more so once the far right takes power. They will use the anti-hate speech laws against their creators because they are easy to abuse.

[–] ormr@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

Lol, no one who just "expresses concern" will be sued in Germany. It will always be insults and incitement to violence that will lead to this.

However I would say that there have been trials because of really "easy" insults, started by politicians. And here you've got a point IMO that these laws are also used for intimidation. As a politician you should be able to tolerate some insults without having to sue each and every offender out there.

[–] ormr@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Very true. Funny how OP's comment was just referring to a completely different argument. Instead of answering the question if the argument brought by the Proton guy could by chance be true, they again referred to their derailing...

[–] ormr@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Whatever artifacts might be there... it's a real photo. I know the guy who was carried away.

[–] ormr@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes that moral imbalance also striked me when reading this. When grandma has a gut feeling towards brown people and talks about that, she'd be called a bigot here. But when it's about men, the highest upvoted advice is to listen to the feeling of fear in your gut...

[–] ormr@lemm.ee -2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If you think Russia can never be trusted you'd have to say the same about the other countries failing their security obligations. Those who guaranteed Ukraines territorial integrity, the US, the UK, didn't act and send their own troops to stop the invasion.

IMO the friendly way hasn't been tried as NATO also didn't care about how Russia feels about this and that. The story is well known. There's not a single country or single person to blame but many of the involved actors.

To me it's lunacy to think Russia will be defeated and split up. Who's going to defeat them? With which soldiers? Europe is an old continent, there are so few young people... It would be the final demise of the European economy having to fight a war with Russia. And do you consider the risks? Russia has nukes. Before anything even remotely to the scenario of being split up happens, it will have used them. No sane person can ignore this threat.

[–] ormr@lemm.ee -2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Yes Schröder was also criticised rightfully for his neoliberal policies that so many socdem governments in the west introduced during these years. But IMO you also have to give him credit for the stuff he was right about, which is so rapidly forgotten. And having peaceful and tighter relationships with Russia, even if it is an authoritarian country, was one of his better ideas. As a European I want peace on this continent. And we're not gonna have peace against Russia, only with Russia.

view more: next ›