I changed it because I was actually confused if this was about Jan 6th or about the Georgia case. Either way, they're going to have to argue that what he did isn't a crime because (whatever nonsense reason). There's no way they can argue a president is immune to prosecution for crimes, and for that reason alone, the kkkonservative justices are absolutely going to skirt the actual question and dismiss the case based on "not a crime".
nxdefiant
joined 2 years ago
I can't imagine a ruling in his favor that doesn't give Biden the power to also commit whatever crimes he wants, but then again I'm not creative enough in the "moral degeneracy" department to qualify as a Republican supreme court justice.
They'll probably rule something asinine like "using a phone isn't treason" and, blinders firmly in place, blow right by the actual question.
That's a win win for the SC.
He wins the election, they can say "Whelp, makes no sense to rule on this until he's out of office again" and hope he dies before dick tatering his way into a third term.
He loses the election, they can decide to rule either way depending on how much grease he's got left in his pockets with no worries about repercussions while they also hope he dies.
The man has a crippling spatula habit, he needs the income.
no idea, but the name is excellent.
I'm naming my mid Iron Python and there's nothing you can do to stop me.
The dev team's boss is literally an elden ring boss.
That guy was definitely a time traveler.
FULL SELF DEFECATING
(I'm sorry, but that fruit was hanging lower than Musk's credibility.)
The money will be dumped into AI
The new scripts will be derivative mashups of the old scripts.
An independent will create a successful film
The new scripts will be derivative mashups of that script.
Next logical step: put wings on this puppy and call it a TRANE.