this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
48 points (87.5% liked)

Technology

34981 readers
157 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rcbrk@lemmy.ml 20 points 9 months ago

~623 km/h in today's units.

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 18 points 9 months ago

Next logical step: put wings on this puppy and call it a TRANE.

[–] TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago

Trains are so freakin cool

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hyperloops are not viable tech at least till energy costs drop dramatically.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

China is massively investing into nuclear power right now, so that could bring the costs down dramatically in the coming years.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not really. Nuclear is very expensive to maintain (due to safety reasons).

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

The cost of maintenance is not really an issue when it's a state run industry. Also, China is building stuff like thorium reactors now that run on molten salt and are inherently safer. Also worth noting that any tech becomes cheaper as you deploy more of it. You get better operating practices, standardization, better safety procedures, and so on. There's nothing about nuclear that makes it uniquely expensive to maintain.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Interesting to see China always doing bigger infrastructures projects. They are pouring money in, great stimulus for the regional economy (despite some cases of misuse) but gets two questions :

  • can such project become economically sustainable enough to last
  • can others outside of China benefit from such expenses
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

When large scale projects are publicly owned, then there isn't really a worry about economic sustainability. In fact, this can be seen as long term job creation since these projects will require on going repair and maintenance. It also looks like countries in the Global South are already benefiting as China's been exporting their infrastructure there. For example, China built high-speed rail in Indonesia and subway in Vietnam.

[–] electricprism@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

I much prefer their revolutionary "Trackless Train"