this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
48 points (87.5% liked)

Technology

34981 readers
111 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hyperloops are not viable tech at least till energy costs drop dramatically.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

China is massively investing into nuclear power right now, so that could bring the costs down dramatically in the coming years.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not really. Nuclear is very expensive to maintain (due to safety reasons).

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

The cost of maintenance is not really an issue when it's a state run industry. Also, China is building stuff like thorium reactors now that run on molten salt and are inherently safer. Also worth noting that any tech becomes cheaper as you deploy more of it. You get better operating practices, standardization, better safety procedures, and so on. There's nothing about nuclear that makes it uniquely expensive to maintain.